Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

has anyone tried this and what level of succes did you get with this setup?

pretty much my question is... is it worth going 26 cams for a rb20 with a big single, or should i look at more serious cams like hks jun et all ?

the turbo will be one of these "china" type turbos

.50 front .63 rear t3 flanged ... equivilant to the smallest gt30r around.

i suspect significant lag will be experienced, but would like to see if the rb26 cams in someones experience is worth doing. if they could reduce lag by around 500rpm compared to stock the price i can get the cams for would be worth it.

cheers

tj

1 - cams are definitely 100% gtr - i know where they came from

2- this turbo isnt china china - its from brazil, seemed to power gotboost to a 11.0 quite well, still fine, runnig alot more boost then i intend too

price is for my eyes only :) sorry dude

3 - cubes, replacement 20's are plentiful and cheap, ill take the risk

anyone with experinces though

I fitted GTR cams in the RB25DET and found, as advised by Ben at Racepace Melbourne (RPMGTR), that they have too much ramp angle causing loss of compression at low RPM, say under 5000, but over they felt pretty good, really good. These were the ones that destroyed Roy's top end, yet they worked to expectation in mine after a polish of the journals. I will be getting a regrind of the flanks to allow for use with the hydraulic lifters and will be posting results elsewhere.

.... These were the ones that destroyed Roy's top end, yet they worked to expectation in mine after a polish of the journals....

Tis was truly a sad day:(

Does anyone know the correct clearance between cams and the journals/caps? Since Geoff had the cams checked and they were true, it would seem that the damage was maybe done by the journal/cap i used off another RB20, as the clyinder where i used it was where the metals gal'd ?!?!?!?!

Is it possible that the clearance was just a little too tight? From memory my inlet cam showed a few wear marks as well. So just how critical are the tolerances when say your engine has 170,000kms on it, and the cams you are installing were from a low kms (something like 35,000km) GTR and the replacement bearing cap was off an unknown RB20...too many variables floating around in there?????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...