Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers Bobby...  The MV kit is a replacement valve body as opposed to a separator plate...  I wonder what the pros and cons are...  :confused:

I'm with strutto, I'd like to know the difference between the two of them.

Either way, I'm 100% in for the group buy once the decision is made on what to get.

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well what we're talking about here from MV is what Zoom magazine put in their 33 4door RB26DETT Auto project '11s'

issue 82

MV Auto

"Its not so much the electronic bits in the gearbox control computer, but rather the hydraulic programming circuits that exist in the valve body. The small channels and restrictors in the valve body allow long, drawn out shift times and the sort of slurry full-throttle up-shifts that can make short work of internal clutch packs."

Zoom goes on to say that the gearbox now had alot more bite, and 1st-2nd gearchanges at full throttle is enough to spin the wheels (this in an rb25de) with 3-4th also alot stronger.

Standard stall converter for re401 is bout 1800rpm

Check the zoom mag article out if your really interested, it has 7-8 photos explaining the process.

I have the MV kit in my R31 skyline, it is excellent

the Trans came in series 3 R31's, r32,r33, silvia's and patrols,WRX's, Rigoli 8.9 wrx

has a modified RE jatco which is just starting to fail now at there power levels.

The silvia converter is the highest stall rating...around 3500rpm on a RB30

Mike does the converter and shift kit for around $900 fitted.

We are currently putting one in a Gemini with a Vl turbo engine,

Mike supplies a separate computer box to run the trans in other cars

He has put one behind a 600kw BA turbo falcon

This is the strongest Jatco out of all of them, and if in good condition

can handle 10 sec passes with standard clutches etc, unlike the

Vl style ones which he only rates to 280rwkw and mid 11's in a full weight car.

And they are CHEAP, because no one knows!!, $100 secondhand

My car is presently receiving a built RB30,3540 etc 20+psi of boost, so will see

how it ultimately holds up in the next 6 mnths. Mike it a top bloke

Angela

The Stagea stall converter sits at 2,300 rpm with full foot brake, just spins the rear wheels a little bit as it gets to 0.3 bar. It jumps to 0.4 bar (max standard boost on the standard turbo) as soon as it moves off.

Put me down for an MV valve body upgrade if there is a group buy on them.:D

The Stagea stall converter sits at 2,300 rpm with full foot brake, just spins the rear wheels a little bit as it gets to 0.3 bar.  It jumps to 0.4 bar (max standard boost on the standard turbo) as soon as it moves off.

Put me down for an MV valve body upgrade if there is a group buy on them.:)

True that,

someone willing to organise the group buy?

ABO BOB: Mike told me Friday that the trans are the same. Yes the silvia

converter will give the highest stall out of all the stock converters, up to

3500rpm. Expect to pay around $400 for one. If you need a higher stall

you will, have to pay around $900. I have had 2 of these trans done now by

Mike, expect a month wait at least at the moment as he is flatout,

Anything more than a 2800 stall will make you car feel heaps laggy on the street

due to slippage.

I'm still wondering whats the diff between replacement valve body as opposed to a separator plate.

Pros & cons?

Does anyone know?

From my limited understanding of autos.....

A separator plate adds restrictions (smaller orifices) to the oil flow where needed. It can also manipulate flow directions. But it can't remove restrictions. If the gearbox only needs restrictions added (to get the right shift performance) then there is no difference between a plate and a full replacement valve body. But if it is necessary to remove some restrictions and rerouting isn't possible, then a valve body replacement is necessary. It is my understanding that to get the best out of the RE4 transmission, a replacement valve body is needed. A spacer plate does an OK job, just not as good.

My suggestion would be to ring MV and ask them exactly why their valve body is better than a plate.

Hope that is of some help:cheers:

I spoke to Mike this afternoon, and got some more information for you.

His advice is that a separator plate will only do 1/4 of the job. The separator plate sits between the valve body halves. A shift plate wont control the shift overlap properly and the only way to improve lubrication as the revs rise is to modify the valve body (something about the factory valve-body restricts the lubrication high in the rev range, but the modified valve-body fixes this). Sorry my knowledge on the black art of Autos is a bit limited, so I hope this explanation Mike gave me satisfies your questions.

I asked about an option to include a new gasket and filter, which Mike said he would highly recommend we all do anyway, will cost about $33 for a "Service Kit"

MV can run the group buy for us but have asked that we do it in groups of 4 at a time. When the first 4 send back their valve bodies these will be modified and overhauled ready for the second group of 4.

Could those who want to take part in this Group buy please PM me to express your interest. Final price is still a little unsure, but the maximum price would be $335 +$50 deposit (refunded when you return your serviceable valve-body) + $33 for a service kit if required.

Apparently R34s use a different valve body but, but Mike can modify these if required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...