Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have thought about this myself.... as a sort of poor mans N1s. Unique Autosports in Sydney ran them on a VG30 in his 300ZX. The engine made well over 300rwkws on an engine with plnety of blueprinting.

So would be interesting to see hwo they go on an RB26, only prob i can think of is if the exhaust/dump flange may be different despite both being GT25s...and also whether the std wastegate actuator clears everything

Yeh but have you driven an S15, the turbos are very responsive. The exhaust A/R would most likley be the same as the HKS 2530 / Nissan N1s at about 0.64.

The way i see it is they are more/equally responsive to 2530s on the SR20, can make 200rwkws on an S15, use steel turbines, but i suspect they are 270 degree plain bearings just as the std R32 GTR turbos are. And they are dirt cheap, you just have to fight CA owners for them.

I dont think they would be laggy at all. My only concern is the orientation of the wastegate actuator

they will require a new custom manifold and dump pipe to fit on a rb20 . but they will be quite well matched to the rb20 . support about 200rwkw , possibly more with cams. they are not ball bearing however unlike similar aftermarket garret GT turbos so dont pay to much

they would also lag like whores as they are designed for 2.0 litre engines, and you are only flowing exhaust from a 1.3 into them ..

other than that they should be pretty sweet

I doubt it.. a single turbo off a GTR is fairly small on it's own and wouldn't really give much power to a 2L either. But in twin form they do quite well :P

2x S15 turbos would be interesting.. although in the end probably too expensive for the gain. Seeing as every other SR owner wants them, it's probably almost as cheap buying two separate aftermarket ones.. or even better an proven RB26dett twin turbo setup in the first place :D

S15 turbos are a modified Garrett GTBB , 2 x 360 deg annular contact BB's . The CHRA is very similar to the Garrett GT28 "320 hp" turbo with minor differences in the compressor wheel to improve response and efficiency .

With the right housings they could work similar to 2510's . The turbine is not the same one used on GT2530's , 28RS's etc so don't know what the engine rev potential would be in the higher boost ranges .

I believe RB26's need compressor covers with the two mount holes for that water/oil plumbing gadget .

Unless they are a give away something designed for the RB26 would be easier to bolt up . You can buy from Garrett a BB GT28 thats in theory identical to the HKS GT2530's so new for less than the HKS tag . I think those open bladed NS111 turbines are worth the effort on an integral gate setup . I'd reckon a fiddle with the cam timing could offset the trivial amountof lag these turbos give over the std bush bearing T28's .

The S15 I drove really didn't make all its boost until around 3000-3500rpm (1bar).

They do actually feel very similiar to an RB20DET running 1 bar as to where and how power is first made.

The Difference with the s15 sr20 is the gear ratio's are shorter & it appears to have more torque off boost which makes the car feel less laggy but really if you watch the rev's and boost guage they get up and going at roughly the same rpm's. Boost is made earlier with the sr20 but peak boost still takes until around 3000-3500rpm.

If that makes sense?!?! :D

So lets say the 600cc drops spool time peak boost for the sr20 turbo's down to around 2600rpm.

2600rpm x 2 if you were to use two of the suckers would = peak boost by around 5000rpm.

I'm not sure if it works like that in practice though. :cheers:

there are 2 different turbo's on the S14's S15's..

not all are ball bearing..

here is how you tell them apart.

All that matters is the garret number, everything else just confuses matters

466541 = ball bearing

466543 = bush bearing

for the second bit of the number

-001 = S14 turbo (no splitter between wastegate and turbine exit)

-002 = S15 turbo (splitter between wastegate and turbine exit)

serial numbers are your friend :cheers:

and it doesn't matter if it's a JAP spec or AUS spec.

there were some BB aus spec's and some NON BB Jap specs and vice versa.

to give you an idea of what the true BB ones are like on an S15, on of the guys in the nissan Sports car club in sydney gets 1.2Bar boost by 2200rpm and holds till close to red line.

most aus spec ones are not ball bearing there are very few infact . if you go through nissan and ask for a replacement s15 turbo you will not get a bb turbo . which sucks because they are only about $1200 thru them .

In short it may be hard to find a true BB s15 turbo and be carefull when buying 2nd hand if its claimed to be BB . CHECK THEM NUMBERS!

my 01 aus spec is not BB :cheers:

What us really poor people do over here is buy GTR Nismo Turbines, w/ the exhaust port and put them on the CA Silvia's. It's a great drift setup, and i'm guessing since you can put a 15 turbine on a CA, and you can put a R turbine on a CA, they both probably fit on the R. I know to put R turbines on CA's you have to rotate the compressor side 90 degrees to get it to fit on the manifold. So you might have to do the opposite when putting a 15 turbine on an R.

ha guys i mate of mine REP003 is installing a rb26 in his 4door gts and has the std turbos fitted with s15 ex housings and wheels with gtr centre i think ,which had to have studs fit also i believe sounded pretty wild to me but should be interesting to see how well they work i will have get more detail off him, as only going off memory. And he believes he can use the s15 dump pipes (stainless separated unit)

the reason he did this i believe is to do away with the ceramic wheels

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...