Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As one of my mates put it, Welcome to the world of Government Bureaucracy.

The NCA have contacted me this morning and require public liability insurance on my behalf before they will approve use of the car park. This puts a major dent in the plans of the cruise. I have contacted an insurance company that deals with charity organisations and unfortunately the cost will be around $600 as a minimum. They advised that we an event this big I am taking a massive risk of being sued should something go wrong.

A disclaimer can only go so far, so my options are...

1. Up the cost of the cruise from $10 - $20. Being an upfront fee to be paid before the event so I know who is attending and part of the cruise (and to pay insurance).

2. In the event that I am able to pay for public liability I will have to use/start a non-profit organisation.

3. Cancel the cruise

4. Any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/63794-charity-cruise-cancelled/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah, the joys of organised events...

SkylinesAustralia is a CAMS affiliated club, isn't it? Therefore, it must be an incorporated club, and this club can take out a public liability insurance policy for club events.

However - given that members don't actually 'join', there might be some issues.

Worth chasing up.

FU*K I AM GETTING SERIOUSLY SICK OF OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!

answer is simple, move the meeting place, cotter is reasonable, but there are better places, questacon carpark, or just next to it at reggatta point? any other suggestions?

i wont be paying any more than $10 to do the cruise and i think you'll find alot of other people hold the same oppinion so the numbers will dramatically drop.

very very angry at our govermnment at the moment!

dude dont cancelllllllll no chance everyone is so looking forward to this. move the venue to somewhere else. why doesnt each car group meet at one point and the cruise together down to the cotter?? will be plenty of parking and the money can be given to a single person in each group. just dont cancel

Dont bother with the NCA, no-one else ever does when they organise a cruise. The way you have been setting this up, I assumed you were part of a CAMS affiliated club and could get all the appropriate insurance organised through them??

If youre just organising this of your own free time, not through an incorporated club, dont bother with NCA etc. Just list a time and place and people will show.

Just sent Ewan an email, Duncan a PM. We arent gone yet, Jayce and I are trying everything to keep this going.

For the record, even if we move the event somewhere else I am still liable as the event organiser should someone want to sue. If there were 20 or so cars I wouldnt be worried too much, with around 100 or so I am its a big risk. After the bloody approval process I have been through its bloody ridiculous that the NCA come back to me a week before the event.

We will have to make this happen!

Skylines Australia NSW is a CAMS affiliated club and has access to public liability insurance under them, but the amount of paperwork required prior to an event would push it back by weeks/months.

If you were running this as an official/CAMS event then you would bother with NCA approval etc.

Just run it as all other clubs do, name a time and place and people will show.

Amaru - Not sure what the situation is with SAU NSW and who they normally arrange public liability insurance with but I have been in contact with Community Care who are able to provide public liability insurance for non-profit organisations fairly quickly. The approval is processed online and I have someone that will look at it straight away should we have an organisation ready to go.

The problem is, if I name a time and place, I am deemed in a court of law, the event organiser and am potentially liable for any law suits. With 100 cars coming its a possibility.

This may come down to me registering as an organisation. Its pretty sad this is required to raise funds for a good cause.

I feel really angry ATM, like I am certain all do. However there are enough good pple working to make this happen that I have the confidence it will go ahead.

I'll be there on the day, no matter the outcome. As an individual (in a large group of ppl trying to do some good).

EDIT:

Public Carparks are PUBLIC by nature of definition?

Motor Vehicle accidents that occur either in PUBLIC carparks or on PUBLIC roads are covered under compulsory Motor Vehicle registration/insurance ?

Am I making sense ?

I can understand the issue of public liability:imagine if someone held you responsible for damage to cars and/or people:any of you prepared to lay the rest of your life paying off a bad judgement call? I can't,and wont,blame Glenn for getting nervous! I'm more pissed at the individual/s that must've known this would be required,and left it 'till the last minute(deliberately?) to spring it upon us.Niiiiice work,morons! But,as stated,we're not beaten yet! And can anyone give me the name,so I can query him/her after this cruise is done,of the person that did this? Serious doubt must arise as to their sense of timing and their understanding of their job description...

OMG!!! WTF!!! this is bullsh!t!!! we are not cancelling cruise, this was like my highlight for the month!! i wouldnt be happy to pay $10 but if i had to i would, there is NO WAY we are cancelling! ill be soooooo pissed off if its cancelled! atleast we have other options, it better not be cancelled for good. but as of location, im down for anything.

This may come down to me registering as an organisation. Its pretty sad this is required to raise funds for a good cause.

Would it be possible to get the red cross to sign on as the not-for-profit organisation, as they are where the money raised is going?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...