Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this guy is an absolute joke, your lucky that the fraudulent crap your pulling wouldnt send you to jail for a first time offence but rest assured keep up this crap and you will be meeting "bubba" really soon. Damien if this tool doesnt get his sh*t together and work it out your way, make a call to the police, theyre obligated to at least check it out and it costs you nothing. If you want to take it further contact a lawyer for some quick legal adivce, I can tell you now the costs of the dispute would outweigh the cost of the pump, but you could certainly put this tool in his place with a civil suit.

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh I remember this character. I organised group buys for the AVCR and also for the 044's and this fool came along and undercut me on both items. I was a bit sus on him but who was to know? I eventually got a better price for the AVCR's and luckily the people who got it from me didnt get ripped off as thay might have by doridori. unfortunately I couldnt get a better price for the 044's :)

Anyway - good luck Damien and I hope it worx out for you.

ps - how'd that dual stage bc work out for you?

Yeah, the boost controller works great, Thanks gr33dy!!:wassup:

Doridori32 has agreed to a $200 refund which puts me out of pocket

whatever the delivery and cod cost is!

For what it's worth I'll send it cod at me expense!

I'll see how we go!

Thanks guys for all your support!

Damien

Those of you who have been shafted should compile all the relevant information about your dealings with doridori32 and pass them on to the authorities.

I have no doubt doridori32 will be receiving a hard lesson in karma in the very near future.

Although the point here is that the guy did not get what he paid for, your arguments about the pump being adequate (apart from being completely beside the point) are totally flawed. I'm far from an expert, but even I can see holes in your logic.

165lph is at 73psi (iirc), meaning that with a 40psi base pressure, at 33psi boost the pump will flow 165lph. So, correct me if I'm wrong, at more sane boost levels the pump will flow less than 165lph. Although 165lph may be enough in itself, this is the pump's max/highest efficiency rating, and it's quite possible that it won't supply enough fuel at (say) 15psi above base to stop his engine from going bang.

But as has been said countless times now, the point here is NOT whether what you supplied is 'adequate', it's the fact that you sold an item that didn't match its description. It'd be like me selling you a GTR, and you got a GTSt with a GTR kit and couple of bolt-ons - they look pretty much the same, they (apparently) perform pretty closely, but it's not what you paid for.

Your going to waste your time buying a "o44 made in czech" you wont need "those specs" .. 165l/ph @ 73+psi is already PLENTY enough - so nexus claims 165 when ive bench testd just under 200lph @ 73psi

I don't claim 165 l/ph

Bosch claims 165 l/ph which is what the fuel pump delivers at 5 Bar at 10 A

So who cares what you have bench marked it at, the Bosch specification sheet that I supplied says differently.

Please show us your official Bosch specification sheet that says that it flows the same amount as the 044.

Bye Bye dori_mines_datsun

don't let the door hit you on the way out

Your going to waste your time buying a "o44 made in czech" you wont need "those specs" .. 165l/ph @ 73+psi  is already PLENTY enough - so nexus claims 165 when ive bench testd just under 200lph @ 73psi

You just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper dont you. If I were you I would shut the f*ck up and sort your problems out before you land yourself in more trouble. The point isnt whether the pump was adequate. I know it may be hard for you, but try and build a picture for yourself. You come to me and give me $150k for a bmw m3, i go hmmm im really in the mood to rip ppl off today so ill sell my normal 3series with the m3 spec bodykit and dodgy engine as the m3. Now you come back and go wtf its not an m3.....what do you reckon? will I get away with saying...ohh but i retrimed it the same as an m3, and it goes just as hard, so whats the difference? For people who are clearly hopeless or appear as though theyre in the 5th grade, people like you, i'll tell you. ITS NOT AN M3. If your sold something other than what was promised, then you get your money back, its not a hard thing to understand. Think yourself bloody lucky that Damien is going to actually pay some money and sort this out, if it were me i wouldnt pay a cent as you clearly dont realise the full weight of what your doing and i'd take pleasure in sending your ass to the police and or court.

If you have any questions dont hesitate to keep them to yourself as noone here wants to hear from you...happy banning, once again mines_tool

btw i also see you in your signature you want a t04r, I can sell you one for sure!! (Its only my old stock 33 turbo highflowed...but i made up some tests that say it flows the same amount and then say your sh*t car doesnt need a big turbo anyway)...you send me money, ill send the turbo, you keen?

I'm not sure that the eThuggery is going to help Damien get his money back.... mines_whatever_the_bloody_hell_it_is_now is just as likely to pack up his bat and ball and go home to have a sulk instead.

Damien appears to be sending the part back COD which means mines_sjdfkjs will have to pay the money to get the part, so it looks like something positive will happen. Of course, Damien is still out of pocket for the COD charges (20 bucks I believe?), and has to trust mines_2131123 to actually pick it up....

btw i also see you in your signature you want a t04r, I can sell you one for sure!! (Its only my old stock 33 turbo highflowed...but i made up some tests that say it flows the same amount and then say your sh*t car doesnt need a big turbo anyway)...you send me money, ill send the turbo, you keen?

Not sure if you even know what a t04R is.. 1.15 a/r not your hiflow.64 crap..

stupid posting stupid crap here.

How about banning dori whoever from selling stuff on the forums until he gets this mess sorted out? I see he has just posted again selling short shift kits, despite being on holidays/in sydney/no internet/whatever other excuse for breaking the law by passing off a product as something else?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...