Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this guy is an absolute joke, your lucky that the fraudulent crap your pulling wouldnt send you to jail for a first time offence but rest assured keep up this crap and you will be meeting "bubba" really soon. Damien if this tool doesnt get his sh*t together and work it out your way, make a call to the police, theyre obligated to at least check it out and it costs you nothing. If you want to take it further contact a lawyer for some quick legal adivce, I can tell you now the costs of the dispute would outweigh the cost of the pump, but you could certainly put this tool in his place with a civil suit.

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh I remember this character. I organised group buys for the AVCR and also for the 044's and this fool came along and undercut me on both items. I was a bit sus on him but who was to know? I eventually got a better price for the AVCR's and luckily the people who got it from me didnt get ripped off as thay might have by doridori. unfortunately I couldnt get a better price for the 044's :)

Anyway - good luck Damien and I hope it worx out for you.

ps - how'd that dual stage bc work out for you?

Yeah, the boost controller works great, Thanks gr33dy!!:wassup:

Doridori32 has agreed to a $200 refund which puts me out of pocket

whatever the delivery and cod cost is!

For what it's worth I'll send it cod at me expense!

I'll see how we go!

Thanks guys for all your support!

Damien

Those of you who have been shafted should compile all the relevant information about your dealings with doridori32 and pass them on to the authorities.

I have no doubt doridori32 will be receiving a hard lesson in karma in the very near future.

Although the point here is that the guy did not get what he paid for, your arguments about the pump being adequate (apart from being completely beside the point) are totally flawed. I'm far from an expert, but even I can see holes in your logic.

165lph is at 73psi (iirc), meaning that with a 40psi base pressure, at 33psi boost the pump will flow 165lph. So, correct me if I'm wrong, at more sane boost levels the pump will flow less than 165lph. Although 165lph may be enough in itself, this is the pump's max/highest efficiency rating, and it's quite possible that it won't supply enough fuel at (say) 15psi above base to stop his engine from going bang.

But as has been said countless times now, the point here is NOT whether what you supplied is 'adequate', it's the fact that you sold an item that didn't match its description. It'd be like me selling you a GTR, and you got a GTSt with a GTR kit and couple of bolt-ons - they look pretty much the same, they (apparently) perform pretty closely, but it's not what you paid for.

Your going to waste your time buying a "o44 made in czech" you wont need "those specs" .. 165l/ph @ 73+psi is already PLENTY enough - so nexus claims 165 when ive bench testd just under 200lph @ 73psi

I don't claim 165 l/ph

Bosch claims 165 l/ph which is what the fuel pump delivers at 5 Bar at 10 A

So who cares what you have bench marked it at, the Bosch specification sheet that I supplied says differently.

Please show us your official Bosch specification sheet that says that it flows the same amount as the 044.

Bye Bye dori_mines_datsun

don't let the door hit you on the way out

Your going to waste your time buying a "o44 made in czech" you wont need "those specs" .. 165l/ph @ 73+psi  is already PLENTY enough - so nexus claims 165 when ive bench testd just under 200lph @ 73psi

You just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper dont you. If I were you I would shut the f*ck up and sort your problems out before you land yourself in more trouble. The point isnt whether the pump was adequate. I know it may be hard for you, but try and build a picture for yourself. You come to me and give me $150k for a bmw m3, i go hmmm im really in the mood to rip ppl off today so ill sell my normal 3series with the m3 spec bodykit and dodgy engine as the m3. Now you come back and go wtf its not an m3.....what do you reckon? will I get away with saying...ohh but i retrimed it the same as an m3, and it goes just as hard, so whats the difference? For people who are clearly hopeless or appear as though theyre in the 5th grade, people like you, i'll tell you. ITS NOT AN M3. If your sold something other than what was promised, then you get your money back, its not a hard thing to understand. Think yourself bloody lucky that Damien is going to actually pay some money and sort this out, if it were me i wouldnt pay a cent as you clearly dont realise the full weight of what your doing and i'd take pleasure in sending your ass to the police and or court.

If you have any questions dont hesitate to keep them to yourself as noone here wants to hear from you...happy banning, once again mines_tool

btw i also see you in your signature you want a t04r, I can sell you one for sure!! (Its only my old stock 33 turbo highflowed...but i made up some tests that say it flows the same amount and then say your sh*t car doesnt need a big turbo anyway)...you send me money, ill send the turbo, you keen?

I'm not sure that the eThuggery is going to help Damien get his money back.... mines_whatever_the_bloody_hell_it_is_now is just as likely to pack up his bat and ball and go home to have a sulk instead.

Damien appears to be sending the part back COD which means mines_sjdfkjs will have to pay the money to get the part, so it looks like something positive will happen. Of course, Damien is still out of pocket for the COD charges (20 bucks I believe?), and has to trust mines_2131123 to actually pick it up....

btw i also see you in your signature you want a t04r, I can sell you one for sure!! (Its only my old stock 33 turbo highflowed...but i made up some tests that say it flows the same amount and then say your sh*t car doesnt need a big turbo anyway)...you send me money, ill send the turbo, you keen?

Not sure if you even know what a t04R is.. 1.15 a/r not your hiflow.64 crap..

stupid posting stupid crap here.

How about banning dori whoever from selling stuff on the forums until he gets this mess sorted out? I see he has just posted again selling short shift kits, despite being on holidays/in sydney/no internet/whatever other excuse for breaking the law by passing off a product as something else?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...