Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i can say we have 3 stageas with "gtr" drivetrains

2 have rb26's

1 was a rs4s (used for parts)

but personally i feel we have 1 with a 260rs drivetrain (hey, its factory fit isnt it), and one with a gtr setup (thats where it was transplanted from)

hey thats nothing ...there all gtr drivlines over here...

going to pick my datsun 180b wagon "bathurst edition" tomorrow.......car use to belong to Jimi Richards ..the salesman told me...and guess what it has attessa 4wd system,fitted by fred gibson motorsport...again the salesman....and as others have pointed out we can call our cars anything we want over here ,,so for me it has a gtr driveline as well

so that will make 4 gtr drivelines for me ...1 stagea ,1 datsun 180B and 2 r32 gtr`s ...

although 1 of the gtr`s has the attesa system and hicas disconnected...so technically that gtr doesn`t have a gtr driveline...:confused:

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its kind of like the people who own a Nissan Bluebird SSS ATTESA.. "Oh its got ATTESA, like the GTR".. in actual fact it is completely different.

Its kind of like the guys who drive Pulsar GTiRS, saying "Its a GTR Hatchback!"

Its kind of like the guys who drive R33 GTS-t's with GTR body kits..

I say call a spoon a spoon.

Its kind of like the people who own a Nissan Bluebird SSS ATTESA.. "Oh its got ATTESA, like the GTR".. in actual fact it is completely different.  

Its kind of like the guys who drive Pulsar GTiRS, saying "Its a GTR Hatchback!"

Its kind of like the guys who drive R33 GTS-t's with GTR body kits..

I say call a spoon a spoon.

Spoon, don't they make performance parts? :(

  • 4 years later...

its kind of more not like gtir saying its a gtr hatch back

Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain

saying a sss blue bird has attesa like a gtr is a true statement

both cars have attesa . they work completely differently but meh .

who gives a f**k how you get the message across . everyone says shit differently . look at all the people who dont know the difference between boost threshold and lag

I'm willing to bet the stagea ATTESA is a lot closer to the system in a GTR than a GTIR/bluebird is. The GTIR is a fairly different setup as far as I remember.

The stagea being originally based on a skyline would mean the GTR's AWD system would've been an obvious choice. I was of the belief that the systems are mechanically about 95+% the same but with the ATTESA computer tweaked for the wagon usage.

The system on the s1 & s2 was from the R33 GTR I believe. Not sure on the M35 but I'd say it'd be more similar to previous stageas too. None of these would be comparable to the R35 GTR though.

Wow, after 4 years you'd think this thread was dead :)

I read on the wiki pages that Bluebird ATTESA (really ATTES) is non-electronic and uses a centre diff' (think about it... it's a transverse-mounted engine)

  • 1 year later...

Hey

Hope you have fun in your Stagea! I have had mine about 2months now and i have had sooo much fun... I hear people say: Check out the chick in the pimped out hurst! hahaha Or i love being at the traffic lights and some old chap says to his partner oh that volvo looks good darling i new we should of stuck with the volvo. arghhhhh fun times :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...