Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright guys...heres the deal.

Was originally going to get a HKS GT2835 Pro S....which would have cost close to $5k including all the oil lines, gaskets etc to bolt straight in.

Got a quote today for a Trust TD05 18G kit for $500 less....it also includes oil lines and gaskets etc to bolt striaght in...AND it includes the greddy intake plenum.

Which would be the better choice ???

also I have a feeling the HKS one is slightly larger than the trust..........can someone please clarify this for me

Cheers

PS

Its for an R34 GTT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/66896-trust-vs-hks-turbos/
Share on other sites

ahh so true.........should have made the title Garrett vs Mitsubishi.

but they said the TD05 will make around 280rwkw......where as the 2835 will make 319kw according to the HKS japan website.

but making that kind of power ill most probably need to toughen up the internals...which will blow the budget a bit.

Bob...I dont think you need a new exhuast manifold for the TD05....well not the 18G anyways.....its a low mount.

well I had my doubts from the begining that the TD05 will make as much power as the 2835.....however that Greddy intake plenum looks awesome...and tidys up the RB25 engine bay a little bit.

Question is...would I get any performance gains from it ?

One disadvantage is that I will lose the TCS

shonen- about the greddy intake plenum no preformance gains unless u are reaching over 300rwkw.. standard is fine unless u got money to waste.

and r31nismoid

td06-25g makes around 300-330

td05 making 280

is that what the turbo is rated at ...? pls explain

yeah in regards to the TD05 thats what I was told by the people who quoted me the price..

obviously there were being a little biased/optimistic.

IanH

NICE website mate.......you got your car pretty much the same time I did and your website was one of the first ones I saw when I did a google search :P....my mate got inspired by your modified Top Secret front bar and is doing the same !!

shonen- about the greddy intake plenum no preformance gains unless u are reaching over 300rwkw.. standard is fine unless u got money to waste.

and r31nismoid  

td06-25g makes around 300-330

td05 making 280

is that what the turbo is rated at ...? pls explain

?

i was talking kw, and thats what the td06-25g made in real life... well.. acutally a few of i've seen are around that figure. thats why its was a bit broad.

i wouldnt expect a smaller turbo with a smaller housing to make close-to figures

The TD05 can make just as much as the 2835, difference is one is pushing 1.5 bars and the other 1 bar at about 400ps. I know because I was going buy a 2835 but decided to work the factory turbo to it's limits. The TD06-20G L2 is on par with the 2835.

Next upgrade either a TD06-25G or GT30 Pro...also about the same but the TD06-25G has prove itself time after time for my motor.

Basically choose the turbo that works well for your motor, see what turbo the tuning shops have used to get the best results.

Also IanH....how come your friend had to get some mods done to fit the turbo ??

I was told the 2835 Pro S is a straight bolt on.....no mods needed.....

on another note I was quoted $4.5k for the TD05 18G and greddy intake plenum

I am at this stage only willing to stretch to $6k MAX.......

would the extra $1.5k cover the cost of getting the TD06 25G instead and also the high mount manifolds ?........I have my doubts...but thought id ask :P

The constant rebuilding of plain bearing turbos wore pretty thin with me many years ago. If it hasn't got balls, I simply don't use it. I don't care what Trust compressor and turbine I come up with, I will always achieve faster boost build and more reliable operation from a ball bearing core. It is then a matter of matching the compressor and the turbine with what it is that you are trying to achieve (max power, driveablility, times etc).

I have read all of your posts in this thread shonen and I am still not sure what it is exactly that you want from your car. It's an auto isn't it? And I can't remember what other mods you have already done. Without that information, suggesting a turbo would be a waste of time from my perspective.:P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...