Jump to content
SAU Community

$30 Dyno Runs! - Chip Control Mini Dyno Day 4th April


Recommended Posts

hi guys,

Chip Control - the company that is sponsoring my R32 N1 GTR race car is holding a mini dyno day on 9th April. Why so cheap? Well Scott Hendren the owner has replaced his old dyno with a brand new Dyno Dynamics Dyno and wants to give it a bit of a run.

All you have to do is go to http://www.chipcontrol.com.au register on the forums and send Scott an e-mail letting him know that you are coming.

Note : there will be no tuning just 2WD dyno runs and Chip Control is located in Sunbury. I will post more specific info like times etc early next week.

Also i've corrected the date to Sat 9th April

A note from Chip Control-

"We are looking at starting the day at about 9.00am,

Dyno runs will be in the order of arrival,

On the day Photos will be taken of your vehicle and pasted in the picture gallery for public viewing.

You will all receive a Dyno print-out of your run.

You will have a choice in how you want your power graph to display.

For example: AFR, Torque etc.

We'll see you all on the day. "

Shivam.

I have actually driven it dip shit, and if you can't see the differance between jealousy and some friendly teasing well shove it up your ass!

Great going Scoota, first post and all you bothered to do was; miss read my post and insult me. Not bad from a person that is trying to organise their first event with SAU.

I have actually driven it dip shit, and if you can't see the differance between jealousy and some friendly teasing well shove it up your ass!

Great going Scoota, first post and all you bothered to do was; miss read my post and insult me.  Not bad from a person that is trying to organise their first event with SAU.

Al, he was kidding around. Take it easy. He wasn't trying to organise anything for SAU. I thought it would be beneficial for our guys to get a $30 dyno run. Please try and organise something cheaper if you think you can.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...