Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

That may be asking a little too much :headspin:

not at all.

There is a car here in Vic thats been running 550awkw on the RB36/30 and its still gonig strong 2-3years now.

and thats not the most power it can make either :cheers:

I don't think you can make that much power and still have it driving reliably as the more you rev it and the more boost the more strain you have, therefore shortening the engines life.

Also is long term leaving it on the shelf,driving it to work,drags on week nights or a bit of club racing? or some of all of them?

Nispro has built a 26/30 that made a tad over 1000hp.

It's not what you call a daily driver or one to cruise around town, it's more strip oriented.

The work involved in building these kind of engines is mega expensive and time consuming. Nizpro made a stronger custom crank girdle to handle, the list is endless....

I wonder how many times he has had to rebuild it  

Think about it 14ltr truck engines produce approx 500hp and you want to put 1000 through 3ltrs and want it to be reliable...... don't think so!!

not one rebuild, you do it right, you wont have a problem.

This is not a once off either. Heaps of other cars here bet belted around the circuit often and are fine

"doubled" -

*have you built any engines - yourself - not a workshop?

*are you an engineer or metallurgist - are you factually stating block strength results of empirical tests or 'seat of the pants' / 'gut feel' type evidence?

*14L truck engines do not produce much power, as they do not operate at high RPM. Note the requirement for trucks is torque to move the mass, not power

*the car R31Nismoid is talking about is empirical / physical evidence that a fully built RB26/31 is capable of long term, high stress (track work) use

It sould to me, like many people here, you are more accustomed to watching DVDs and reading magazines / forums, taking as gospel and regurgitating.

I've witnessed it with my own eyes.

Are we talking about 1000hp on pump fuel here or something more exotic?

I have a SBC on gas and I could never afford to drive it everyday that's for sure. :P

I am a qualified mechanic, and have been out of that for a fair while, I understand that technology changes, but there is still the wear factor & reliability,

and by pushing things well past their "designed power" output i feel that there life expectancy will suffer greatly.

the car has done inexcess of 400km's

And so have many other.

we are talking 20thou, 30thou... cars are still running strong.

Whats so hard to beleive if they are physically there doing it on the track at most track meets each year?

It can, and has been done, and not just once.

If your tuning is right, your servicing resiliant... and you dont have something like a fuel pump fail and starve the engine...

There is no reason why anything cant last years.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...