Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

;)

Paradizzle: Correction, the r31 is a tissue box. r33's are boats. Somewhere between those two series you have a nice angular car called the r32.  

And where would we be without those beautiful whales..

yeah they went from a tissue box to a Milk Crate to pure style ... just joking each to their own :P

I seem to change cars about once every year, not intentionally but thats just the way it ends up. From talking to other people I still think the 15 year rule has had some effect on it, but it still doesn't explain r33 gtr prices.

the offical import figures of the 15 yr old cars was just over 10,000 - not 15,000 or 20,000....

I doubt you can get an R34 GTR over here for under 70k...

I'll be keeping my R32 GTR.... period. must remember that a lot of ppl get loans for their cars, some might lose their jobs, some might want to get out of debt etc, some might lose their licence, insurance too much etc etc - hence the turnover.

the offical import figures of the 15 yr old cars was just over 10,000 - not 15,000 or 20,000....

I doubt you can get an R34 GTR over here for under 70k...

I'll be keeping my R32 GTR.... period. must remember that a lot of ppl get loans for their cars, some might lose their jobs, some might want to get out of debt etc, some might lose their licence, insurance too much etc etc - hence the turnover.

There's a an R34 GTR for under 70 grand, and its tidy as!! But it is true you can import one for about 55 grand landed, complied and registered.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=69670

In 2004 about 17,000 cars were imported into Australia, verses just under a 1,000,000 new car sales.

I've just imported 3 cars under the 15 year rule. One thing you have to remember is that the final figure you pay for the car is about 60+% over the actual cost of the car (including rego & stamp duty, a service, and dyno tune). Everyone of the cars I brought in went thousands over the expected cost despite using cost calculators at two different import sites.

mine was within about $100..

The GTR thing is pretty easy.. those with money don't want that sort of car.. and these days there is more cop presence and hassles (esp. vic) as there are just generally more imports around. Most also know the car is going to depreciate a heap, and hence will spend the money on something more meaningful such a property or other investment.

It's no longer than 'special' to own a GTR and the age of them is now getting on 10 years for most, so the once elite status of them has gone too.. "you have a 10 year old car that cost you $40,000??!! er great"

I think the price of Silvia's and Skylines etc at the auctions is quite high.

I bought a japanese equivilent of the trading post with just cars/motorbikes for sale and

visited some car yards in japan and they had private sales of R32 GTS-T's for $1000-3000 and silvia's for maybe $500-2500 (basic cars,1990 etc) while at auctions they seem to sell for heaps more.

It was very very tempting but i did not have enough money after my holiday for shipping and arranging everything.

:rofl:

There's a an R34 GTR for under 70 grand, and its tidy as!! But it is true you can import one for about 55 grand landed, complied and registered.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=69670

Can you advise me where i can get a fully complied and registered r34 gtr for $55000. I know about the one for $65000 , but $ 55000 is a 10 grand saving .

cheers

michael

0411838659

The reason for the sudden decline in value I believe is mainly due to the Japanese registration system.

After 3 years, registration becomes more expensive, and then every 2 years subsequent to this registration costs increase again and again to the point that it becomes more cost effective to sell the car and buy a new one. Because registration becomes so expensive, no one (in Japan) wants older cars, therefore their value plummets. ie value is declining exponentially with respect to time.

With regard to R34 and R33 GTRs, they are simply moving down the exponential depreciation curve, it is perfectly natural for imports. And as for R32 GTR prices, they have probably reached their residual value and will not depreciate much further.

Buy an import under 5 years old and you will face massive depreciation. But then again it is the same with most cars. Imports will generally depreciate at higher rates though due to the Japanese registration system.

few of the reasons prices have come down are:

1. more people are willing to buy direct from japan, through a broker or by themselves, as opposed to a few years ago when import car yards charged what they wanted. As word of mouth and people who have mates who have done it increase, they become more and more willing to take the gamble. Couple of years ago, buying a car in japan was taboo, but perfectly safe to buy from an import dealer. Now buying from a dealer is not something special.

2. RAWS... more and more companies are getting compliance plates for common cars. THe best example and most suited to your question is the R33. a year ago, compliance for the R33 GTSt was about $5000 now its as low as $3000. At work I've seen compliancers call in with lower and lower prices because they can't move any cars with the amount of competition.

3. Strong aussie dollar, if you check the exchange rate, at around this time last year the dollar was at 70 yen to a dollar, we are now hovering around the 80 yen to a dollar mark. While this is not a big difference, it can usually knock about $500 off the initial cost of the car.

People can't sell they're cars because they're working on Australian depreciation rates and not japanese rates. Cars are cheaper to import these days than a car that's already been imported and has depreciated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...