Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hmm depends what you want to do? Mates got r31 and i find them to be a solid car that doesnt brake :(

To give you an idea what you can do with it;

Turbo your rb30 (rb30et)

Put in an rb20 or rb25 engine :(

but if you add a turbo it would be best to upgrade your stock brakes to something like r33 gts-t brakes, also add an lsd would help get the power down better

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1344151
Share on other sites

go the 31!

definately move towards a brake upgrade even if its just good pads fluid but if your going to up their power go caliper rotor swap

pm DSTURBD if you need eny parts he farms 31s down south in the bunno area and should be able to supply anythign you need cheap

but yeah a very solid safe car to be hit in...... lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1344287
Share on other sites

become and SAU member, then go down to all the sponsors and ask them to go to town on it :(

I am a SAU member :wassup:

Hey at least i know I'M going to be safe if i get rammed into or fly off the road... Hehe

Ok so brakes and a turbo good thing to start off with then ey,

Great Help guys cheers :(

Splatt

(keep it coming)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1344509
Share on other sites

I dont think putting a turbo on it is as easy as it sounds, you are going to spend twice the value of the car by doing that, would be better off buying something with turbo already in it.

oh and for all the ppl using the other view.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1344759
Share on other sites

Good to see another female wanting to improve her car. :(

I agree with gun32, if thats the way you want to go. Turbo = bigger brakes needed.

Personally, I think you should just keep that car for a while & get used to driving for a start, save up money & then buy a newer car already with a turbo in it after a year or two, if power is what you want.

By putting a lot of time & money into converting a car you might in the end decide to change up after a while, so just think ahead about what you want to do, and from there it is easy. If you are going to do it, you would probably be spending as much as you would by getting something similar, like a 180sx.

Good luck, keep us updated. :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1345351
Share on other sites

man i should change my name to a girls name then post a photo of some hot chick as my aviator then ill get help straight away........ look how many replys this chick gets in 1 day to her thread

lol

You saying im hot? :cooldance

HAHA

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1345415
Share on other sites

aviator?  

As Driver asked, looks or performance is the question!

Let me help u pimp ur ride!  You do the spending though :(

Hmm well with what everyone is saying maybe i should go with looks for now till i do get used to driving around a bit more,

I'll have to see what happens.

Gettin a half cut sounded alright but might look into that a bit further and see how we go..

Thanx guys

Nat:cooldance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73166-help/#findComment-1345458
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...