Jump to content
SAU Community

  

311 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

when buyin my car

my first choice was a supra as i've always wanted one since i first saw them

Yeah, I was lucky enough to be allowed to test drive one when I was shopping around with my dad for my car & I'm still drooling from the experience hehe.

I love how the dash seems to wrap around you and the electric seats were fun to play with too :headspin:

However I am forever loyal to skylines now so I voted for the GTT

hmm you sure about that release date ??????

cause mines a March 98 build........... No. 216 off the line....

According to the details that i have er34 was released for sale may 98 and bnr 34 , january 99 .

I guess they would have built some cars before the release date .

I have no reason not to believe the info that i have ..

Ok what about 4 door versions

R34 GTT 4 door

       vs

JZX100 chaser mkII

I still can't decide.

Oh geez, here we go! I vote the JZX100 for sure. Ok, maybe i'm bias, but they're hot. And no where near as many on the roads as the 34's, so relatively unique. However that works against you when you're modifying it, as i've found out recently....

One other factor I guess you also have to take into consideration is vehicle age and price. A majority of RZs going around are 93/94 (pushing to say 1995) models, while the oldest R34 is a 1998 model. You look at 1998 model supras and your looking at big $$$. We all know what I am getting at

...

Go the R34 :rofl:

i love my nissan. i really do. the gtr is a much better package than the supra when it comes down to driving. the supra FEELS heavy, when the line feels much more sporty. compare an RZ to a GTT??? supra any day.

and anyone that thinks toyota's better engines (1j, 2j, 1uz among many others) aren't performers better get their facts right. if it weren't for my loyalty to nissan engineers, i'd drop one of those engines into my gtr anyday. the 26 is nice. very nice. but its not as nice as a nice toyota six or eight imo.

2c

d

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...