Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

g'day

i have a question about "dyno dynamics" dyno's and their settings...

i have seen that the intake temp is the main setting that seems to vary from graph to graph when different people put their power figures up

so my question is...

what would the power difference be for a car run with an intake temp of 14deg versus an intake temp of 30deg on the settings? (assuming everything else is constant...)

would this be significant, or just a couple of killowatts?

obviously its not an issue, i was just thinking...

(its almost exam time so i have plenty of time on my hands and will do anything to procrastinate!)

cheers,

Warren.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74943-dyno-settings-query/
Share on other sites

Shoot Out Mode (SOM) compensates for temperature differences. So a guy in Tasmania in winter should get the same power if he was in Cairns in summer.

The old rule used to be 5% change in power for every 8 degrees change in temperature. I have no idea what DD apply for SOM correction.:P

it makes a difference on a turbo car is the sensor is in the engine bay as the sensor see's...

eg: 50 degrees due to a pod and no CAI... but then it goes through an I/C on a turbo car so the car is actually seeing a different temp and shootout is applying a correction that isnt quite correct.

Its different for an N/A car.

I've seen a 10-15rwkw difference in my car using shootout with the sensor inside, and outside the engine bay.

reason i asked is that when i got my car dynoed it was about 15deg outside, and the temp was measured at the intake manifold, so the real temp getting to the cylinders

but on dyno days i see them placed at the air filter and temps of 30deg

so let me rephrase my question...

- dyno in shootout mode

- car in same workshop, same day, same time of day

- car gets power measured with IT set to 15

- then car gets power measured with TI set to 30

same figure?

reason i asked is that when i got my car dynoed it was about 15deg outside, and the temp was measured at the intake manifold, so the real temp getting to the cylinders

but on dyno days i see them placed at the air filter and temps of 30deg

so let me rephrase my question...

- dyno in shootout mode

- car in same workshop, same day, same time of day

- car gets power measured with IT set to 15

- then car gets power measured with TI set to 30

same figure?

Use the 8 degrees = 5% rule of thumb.

Need more info though....

1. What is the ambient temperature (AT)?

2. What is the rwkw reading at the 15 degrees Inlet Temperature (IT)

:(

Interesting question this, was trying to apply this theory to two.60l's thread where she made 466 rwkws in shoutout (8) mode, but when asked to provide a graph in non shootout mode the reply was "there's no difference".. WTF??

Anyway as an example my car made 335rwkws (Racepace dyno dynamics), and then backed up with 360rwkws in shootout mode!!!!

Haven't got a printout of the 360rwkw (shootout mode) run, so sorry can't compare temp readings...

Although next week i'm getting poncams installed and a retune so I'll get Ben to do a run in shootout mode aswell as normal mode... STAY TUNED!!!

Interesting question this, was trying to apply this theory to two.60l's thread where she made 466 rwkws in shoutout (8) mode, but when asked to provide a graph in non shootout mode the reply was "there's no difference".. WTF??

That could be true, if the Ambient Temperature and the Inlet Temperature are at the temperature that DD have selected as their "reference temperature".

Anyway as an example my car made 335rwkws (Racepace dyno dynamics), and then backed up with 360rwkws in shootout mode!!!!

That's normal, and precisely what I would expect if the Ambient and Inlet Temps are hotter than the "reference temperature". It is exactly the same as dynoing your car in summer (335 rwkw) and then again in winter (360 rwkw).

Although next week i'm getting poncams installed and a retune so I'll get Ben to do a run in shootout mode aswell as normal mode... STAY TUNED!!!

That should be interesting:cheers:

Use the 8 degrees = 5% rule of thumb.

Need more info though....

1. What is the ambient temperature (AT)?

2. What is the rwkw reading at the 15 degrees Inlet Temperature (IT)  

:rofl:

1. the ambient temp was about 15deg

2. the car made 132rwkw at 14deg inlet temp

if its 15deg outside, even with a FMIC surely i could not be seeing 15deg at the inlet manifold? would have thought realistically the inlet air would have been about 20deg

but if i were at a dyno day instead of having booked tine on the dyno the probe would be elsewhere and definately not measuring 14deg... maybe the probe wasn't even hooked up? and it was jsut set at 14deg?

hmmmm

1. the ambient temp was about 15deg

2. the car made 132rwkw at 14deg inlet temp

if its 15deg outside, even with a FMIC surely i could not be seeing 15deg at the inlet manifold?  would have thought realistically the inlet air would have been about 20deg

but if i were at a dyno day instead of having booked tine on the dyno the probe would be elsewhere and definately not measuring 14deg... maybe the probe wasn't even hooked up? and it was jsut set at 14deg?

hmmmm

Thats the problem with dyno days sometimes they dont take the time to set the cars up properly as it takes longer between runs.

But unless the all the sensors are in the correct positions ect. the results mean nothing.

Example

Ice performance Dyno 195 rwkw

All sensors in correct positions ect. 22 deg day in shootout mode.

Local Dyno comp 156rwkw

no sensors in airbox, no fans infront of the cars, 40 deg day, no shootout mode

car ran great no pinging at all.

Shoot out has some pretty generous enertia values (esp shoot 8), hence the higher numbers. Intake temp is also corrected back to 20C, so placing the sensor in behind the rad will give a substantial 'improvement ' also.

We like to use ambient air for Intake temp and 0 enertia. When done in this manner, the cars perform as per the hp calculators. When using shoot numbers, the cars underperform........

Shoot out has some pretty generous enertia values (esp shoot 8), hence the higher numbers. Intake temp is also corrected back to 20C, so placing the sensor in behind the rad will give a substantial 'improvement ' also.

We like to use ambient air for Intake temp and 0 enertia. When done in this manner, the cars perform as per the hp calculators. When using shoot numbers, the cars underperform........

That's the answer I was looking for!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hence some dyno figures getting around which are truly over the norm....

The difference explained to me by a DD rep quite a while ago:

Inlet Temp - Ambient Temp / 5 = x% difference.

Ex : It's a 25 degree day and the probe is placed in the engine bay and reading 55 degrees.

55-25/5 = 6% will be added to the measured power in shootout mode.

The difference explained to me by a DD rep quite a while ago:

Inlet Temp - Ambient Temp / 5 = x% difference.

Ex : It's a 25 degree day and the probe is placed in the engine bay and reading 55 degrees.

55-25/5 = 6% will be added to the measured power in shootout mode.

Isn't that only half the story? That's the correction for Inlet Temp being above Ambient Temp, but what about Ambient Temp being above DD's reference temp? Based on RPMGTR's post wouldn't it apply additional correction for the Ambient Temp being 25 degrees compared to DD's reference temp of 20 degrees?

Keep in mind Shoot Out Mode doesn't always ADD to the power readings. If the Ambient and Inlet Temps are less than DD's reference temp then it will show LESS power.

:P

Agree with you...

The point i was making, is the discrepancy on where the temp probe is placed and the effect it has on the readings.

There was a dyno sheet where the IT was 82 degrees, a while back.

true...

i remember seeing a thread comparing optimx to bp ultimate

ultimte made about 10 more rwkw, but also had an IT 10-15deg higher than the optimax reading...

hmmmmmm... bit sus to me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...