Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i own one, also own a 32 gtr, and i love it but i really cant answer your question without writing an essay, and i cant be bothered, they get crap fuel economy tho

They can handle big massive turbo's with minimal turbo lag!

They rev high when ported and modified.

They sound so great.

They have shit fuel econemy

They are very light

They sit back in the firewall, good weight distrubution

They are cheap to fix

There is jack shit to modifiy on them

Thats about all...

Ill be buying one soon :Pimp2:

my interpretation is thus: It is very similar to the 4 stroke, 2 stroke debate, as rotary's operate as essentially a 2 stroke. Thus while they can burn a lot more fuel per second, and hence get more power, they do so inefficiently. This has become a problem with changes in emissions regulations. However practically you can get a lot of power out of very small displacements, and hence get fantastic power to weights. Similarly because of the large amount of fuel they can burn, they couple with turbo induction very very well. A typical downside is things like that the whole central rotor has to move, and so there is a lot of friction wear on the seals, which has given it a bad reputation (I think) for reliability. Overall many companies and individuals worked on the rotary concept (mercedes, nissan to name a few) however only mazda continued for such a long time (rather like wankel). They certainly have some great positives, but also a number of downsides, which is perhaps why they have never been largely taken up. That's just my rough overall summary of rotaries :P.

I'm in the exact same position as you Lang!

Although I'm off-loading my RX7 for an sr20 180sx X-Type, hopefully, this week.

For me, the 7 was a fun, quick, sidways car. Love the way it looks from the front, hate the back (series 5)

Lang is spot on, they drink! Also I have found that they are very high maintenance, so cbs with it anymore. BUT, they have very high modification potential, hence their popularity and I suppose there's something about a rotary engine that draws people towards it, that I just can't put my finger on.

my interpretation is thus: It is very similar to the 4 stroke, 2 stroke debate, as rotary's operate as essentially a 2 stroke. Thus while they can burn a lot more fuel per second, and hence get more power, they do so inefficiently. This has become a problem with changes in emissions regulations. However practically you can get a lot of power out of very small displacements, and hence get fantastic power to weights. Similarly because of the large amount of fuel they can burn, they couple with turbo induction very very well. A typical downside is things like that the whole central rotor has to move, and so there is a lot of friction wear on the seals, which has given it a bad reputation (I think) for reliability. Overall many companies and individuals worked on the rotary concept (mercedes, nissan to name a few) however only mazda continued for such a long time (rather like wankel). They certainly have some great positives, but also a number of downsides, which is perhaps why they have never been largely taken up. That's just my rough overall summary of rotaries :P.

2mm Ceramic seals can fix that problem :D

New,good seals should last upto 100,000klms with a high powerd engine running sufficient boost levels.

people are scared but they don't understand or have sufficient knowledge, explaining how a piston engine makes power is easier to ur average joe then explaining how there a chamber with a triangular shape thing in the middle which sits on an eccentric shaft and rotates thru a epchyotroidal (spelling) revolution and makes power 3 times per revolution.......

the main reason why rotoarys got a bad reputation of reliability is because thed mazda service folks would replace the whole engine instead of replacing the broken part. My house mate has a mazda RX3 which still running and has never needed a rebuild.

The other reason that the have an unreliable name is that they can very easily run hundreds of KW's and like any engine need to be very well built to witstand the force. A dodgy 6 will still die as 500kw if it is dodgy.

In their stock condition they can be fairly efficant and the RX8 is one of the cleanest cars for emissions. The old ones aren't because they are before the times off emmision control and therfore no cat etc.

The engine is very small and very simple (only 3 moving parts). Because if goes around and around instead of up and down they can rev much higher then a piston engine up around 12000rpm if you really want to.

They are great for turbo's as the engine moves alot of air. This allows for monster turbos on a 1.3L engine.

Overall they are a great engine to work with as long as you have apassion for them and you know what you are doing with them.

Igonr: Each rotor will have 3 power "strokes" per revolution. The 10a, 12a and 13b have 2 rotors so that is 6 power "strokes" per revolution of the engine. A piston has one power stroke every 2 revolutions. Therefore a 12 cylinder piston engine will have the same number of power strokes as a 2 rotor engine. If you move to the 20b (3 rotors) or 26b (4 rotors) then your going to have more power then you know what to do with.

Igonr: Each rotor will have 3 power "strokes" per revolution. The 10a, 12a and 13b have 2 rotors so that is 6 power "strokes" per revolution of the engine. A piston has one power stroke every 2 revolutions. Therefore a 12 cylinder piston engine will have the same number of power strokes as a 2 rotor engine. If you move to the 20b (3 rotors) or 26b (4 rotors) then your going to have more power then you know what to do with.

Interesting... thanx for that.

A few people i know seemed to have changed with the wind and are now on the rotary band wagon and i dont know why.

Whats the pros and cons with a rotary engine over your normal 6.

I own a bridgeport RX4 coupe and an R31 GTSX . The skyline is a great cruiser for everyday travel.Its even got a child seat in the back.Economical and goes pretty hard(r32 silver top engine).The RX4 is brutal!!!! Heaps of grunt from the Weber fed 13b(turbos go so much harder too!) But the best thing is the sound.Love it or hate it every one knows you are coming and boy do they look.(Coppers too!).

Fuel economy is shithouse(advise getting 2nd job) especially when you realise that we are talking about 12A(1200cc) and 13B(1300cc) motors.To make good power ie;200 rwk from a rotary costs a lot less than a 6cyl.Check out how fast they go at the drags.Sub 7 sec passes in O.Z!!!!! Some bent 8 cars spent 30 - 40 thou to run 10sec 1/4 times.10sec eng packages for rotarys from about 6 - 10 grand.And still streetable with programmable engine management.Thats why there are so many cars on the track!

The price of a good car is still affordable, remembering most are 30 + years old(unless you have lots of dough to buy late model RX7's).Parts are available for most but more and more expensive all the time.(check ebay.)RX3 is the most popular and buying one is an investment you won't loose from.The price of import skylines has fallen pretty hard lately,old rotary cars have increased.

A lot of people(Simple minded neanderthal types)write off rotary cars because they have never driven one or have had their ego dented by one in a traffic light drag.Typical Holden or Ford V8 fans call them by heaps of names "chook cookers" "beer kegs" and just "jap crap".I could go on forever but you have probably already stopped reading by now anyhow.

By the way, my R31 GTSX is up for sale!!! Not the RX4though.Love the Skyline but need the dough for a new bussiness.If interested call me on 0405 202 395.Wazza.

every time the engine performs one revolution, it combusts 3 times. that's good for power.
And what does a 6 cylinder in-line do??????

The main advantage of the rotary is that the "piston" (rotor) mass keeps moving in the same direction, unlike a "conventional" 4-stroke, in which the piston has to stop twice in each cycle (once at TDC, and once at BDC). So rotaries just keep revving. which is why they can make big power numbers (power = torque * rpm). They have pretty shite torque, but loads of rpm. (diesels on the other hand have enormous torque and shite rpm, but that's )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...