Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I bought the innovate lm-1 kit to tune the afr with the datalogit.

It interfaces easily to one of the 0-5v analogue inputs and allows you to plot average afr for each load cell. Very easy to tune with.

I do the same with the tech edge...also too easy.

Hey BMX, hows the wrx catch can?

After finishing the current tank of fuel I was on I managed to travel 402km's on a full tank. This is a significant increase in fuel economy. The wideband tuning was done when my fuel tank was just over 1/2 used and the ODO was on approx 220km's when we had finished wideband tuning. I usually get approx 330km's to a full tank.

I will see how it goes next week as I have just filled up today. I expect around 450km's to a full tank which is a massive improvement.

Thanks to all of those who have offered help and assistance.

The PowerFC guide will be updated in the next few days to include the wideband on road tuning and how to do it.

Paul I reckon your problem lies somewhere else. The stock ECU and Powerfc should give about the same fuel consumption if you dont hamer it much. You wil be in closed loop most of the time - relying on 02 sensor reading.

Are you getting around 14.7AFR at idle and whenever car is in closed loop?

I was getting about 400-450km to a tank (about 11-12L/100km) without the powerfc tune. When stuck on the dyno the AFR went into the 9s at full throttle.

Since the tune I got about 460km to the tank (10.6L/100km) but I reckon if I stayed off the gas then I don't think there would be any difference in consumption. The timing down low doesn't give you much benefit in fuel economy. I think a wheel alignment might give you more if you have too much toe.

You should check your injector duty cycles and air flow voltage at say 60km/h, 70, 80 and 90 in 4th gear (on the flat) and compare them with others on here.

Maybe you just sit in bad traffic or have a lead foot!! hehehe

no i wasnt getting 14.7 under normal closed loop, the whole close loop imho is a bit of rip i think, it takes so long for the stocky 02 sensor to give anything useful to the ecu about the afr's almost not even worth having it on.

when ive done a full tank im gonna turn off 02 feedback.

with proplerly tuned afr's i dont think 02 feedback will do anything other than waste calculating power. ive never had good economy on the FC until now, when i tuned the INJ map with a wideband sensor. before then it was always average is 320/330/340. on a full tank of fwy i would get maybe 400 if i was lucky. never ever ever over.

stock ecu economy was ok ish, not super great. not over 400 thats for sure

i do mild spiritied driving some of the times but the majority is light load / cruise. my inj duties however around 1.8% 2.2% on light cruise

I just came back from Bendigo taking it easy and i got 390ks before the light comes on. I generally can push this out to 450 before i fill up (love running it on empty) Last tank 434ks. I was quite dissapointed with the open road cruising as i took it easy and was only gettting 100ks every quarter of a tank. When we tuned it we concentrated alot on fulll throttle but didnt do much on light throttle since upping the fuel pressure so i guess its guzzling on light throttle. Im smoothing out the part throttles Inj cycle to try and bring a little more effeciency into it. Even with the bigger turbo i think i could still get 500ks on a trip but might need a dyno to see my AFR's at light throttle.

Im experimenting at leaning it out a little on light throttle but its all guess work until i get a monitor. Remember i could only be adjusting it 1% here and there so its really not going to make much. I hope i dont lean it out too far.

about to upload my current tune data and .dat files and also got the datalogit afr chart in excel so i can spit out my afr's apparently based on what the pfc inj map values you are (so it claims anyway)

attached fuel inj compare against last tune and also fuel map and also datalogit tune .dat file. rename .txt to .dat and use it with datalogit if you wish

post-2054-1138879080.jpg

post-2054-1138879124.jpg

paulr33_193rwkw_widebandtuneup.txt

thanks Robo for pointing that out, something i clearly missed.

I managed to get 504k's to a full tank of all hwy driving on the weekend,

This week is city testing, so far 100k's on just under a 1/4 of a tank.

Will update those 3200rpm cells, should be 1.00 instead of 1.070

I was getting about 400-450km to a tank (about 11-12L/100km) without the powerfc tune.  When stuck on the dyno the AFR went into the 9s at full throttle. 

Since the tune I got about 460km to the tank (10.6L/100km) 

460km to the tank at 10.6L/100km would suggest that you have only a 48.76L fuel tank.

To properly work out fuel economy you need to start with a full tank, resest the trip meter drive how ever many Km's you want then refill tank to full and compare your actual Km's travelled to the amount of fuel you needed to fill it back up.

My around town fuel consumption for my PFC tuned 25t is 15L/100km which would be 433km's on a tank (65 litres) full to empty.

I did the fill up reset the trip, then fill up again to get those readings. Thats the only accurate way you can do it. Not everyone is going to run it dry..I ran it till almost E and got 460km - no doubt plenty left - yes I put in close to 49L. You probably will never run it down to less than 5L unles you really push it.

15L/100km is horrid. To be honest though I havent really done much heavy traffic driving - I guess mine would probably go to 12-13L/100km then. They are only a 2.5L engine. If u use boost a lot then expect bad consumption.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...