Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

AFR check tonight, i took a stab at the dark with the AFR values and was a bit too lean, a touch over 12.3ish so leaned it back to spot on 12.0 (see graph).

post-2054-1151406844.jpg

Ill be leaving the tune as is for now, no more changes. I had a bit more detonation where I leaned it out back to 12 so took out 1 deg in that range to keep the knock to a consistent level

after realising that i've done the VCt testing wrong (thanks cubes) i picked an arbitrary rpm value and applied it. this time kickoff at 5500rpm. seat of pants it seems to be a bit more chunky in the top end and doesnt give a coming on max power and then jump into more max power past 4700rpm if that makes sense. it just seems to feel chunky the whole way. attached is latest datalogit tune as of tongiht, with AFR fix and 5500 VCT

rename to .dat and open in datalogit for RB25

vct_fiddling.txt

  • 4 months later...

latest tune after our nsw trip

i had to lean out the areas for 110km/h

also took out a few deg timing on the map permenantly

found it was knocking a little under 3 grand on medium ish load up small hills

also moved vct back to 5100rpm and locked the boost table (as i dont have the boost kit)

on the highway upto nsw i managed a best of 540ks to a tank with 02 feeedback off

feel free to view with datalogit (rename to .dat) or look at the excel sheet

i would not recommend loading my maps, but you can use it for reference

datalogit tune:

http://paulr33.skylinesaustralia.com/tuned...-110-update.dat

excel maps:

http://paulr33.skylinesaustralia.com/tuned...-110-update.xls

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 months later...

been a while since an update. not much has changed on my tune. just some minor touch ups

ive lost my licence so car has seen bugger all driving. get it back in july, woohoo!!

anyhoo here is my ign maps vs stock apexi defaults, as you can see i run stacks of timing.

below 3 grand you can dial in heaps more with minimal knocking. the car drives ace and has amazing throttle response.

IGN Compare.xls

Normal excel format. Positive number means ive advanced the timing, negative means retarded. You can see on row zero I am retarded by about 30 deg this is because my P01 row is all zero's. This gives the car lots of pops and farts and makes it sound really cool & fun, race car style.

Paul, I've done similiar with P01 but for drivability reasons.

It made cruising around in car parks a tad smoother, do remember the stock rb20det map runs high 30's to low 40's through P01, I'm down to just under what the stock rb25det map runs. :mad:

i dont run less ign timing, i run zero. so that whole top row under SETTING, IGN MAP is all 0's

i did it for a bit of fun. that row is only touched on gearchange or when you back off on the throttle.

ie at normal idle you are on P02 as there is airflow load. when you dump throttle or gearchange airflow drops to 0 or near zero so it hits row P01.

running 0 deg IGN timing makes the car pop, fart, backfire, crack so its just a bit of fun. i love it. everyone comments on how much my car pops, farts and backfires when driving around. i dont believe there is any other gain than noise to be honest :mad:

For mine it simply made the transition of going from no throttle to very very light throttle (car park driving) noticably smoother. But yes.. Thats stepping down from the rb20det like ign values to very similiar of what the rb25 runs. ;)

ive often wondered of doing a map trace

find the exact path it follows

then edit one of the cells along the way in the high load area

and bang in 0 deg ign timing

should be a laugh ;)

yeah im going to decat my car before i get my licence back so it should shoot flames for sure

its pops its ass off on back off and gearchange. ive had it set like that for probably 5-6 months maybe.

daily driven, sometimes babied around, other times given some abuse etc.

safe tune, aggressive ign timing all over the shop, 12afrs and normal plain vanilla 12psi and normal 98ron fuel (mixed servos)

I too will decat my car in the next week or so and run it up on the dyno to see what difference it makes. I have a high flo already so I'm not sure how much of a gain it will be. We will see and have some flames maybe also.

I too will decat my car in the next week or so and run it up on the dyno to see what difference it makes. I have a high flo already so I'm not sure how much of a gain it will be. We will see and have some flames maybe also.

Are you doing a dyno run before and after "de-catting" your exhaust?

I'd be interested to see results...

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...