Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a lot of threads lot on what would win stock for stock for 0-400m and 0-100kmph. So I decided to make this list as a bit of a guide. Sources vary but I tried to take the manufactures claimed times were possible.

I will update it from time to time.

0-100kmph 0-400m

NISSAN

R34 GTT 6.2 14.2

R33 GTS25T 6.18 14.4

R32 GTST 6.5 14.8

GTR

R32 4.7 13

R33 4.9 13.2

R34 4.9 13.1

300ZX Z32 TT 2Seater 5.6 14.2

Silvia S13/180sx

CA18DET 6.9 15

SR20DET 6.2 14.5

S15 Jap spec 5.5 13.8

TOYOTA

MR2 GT 6.12 14.37

Soarer SC400 2.5TT 7 15.1

Soarer SC400 V8 8.9 16.5

Supra RZ 5.92 13.93

Supra SZ 6.6 14.9

Mazda RX7

86-88 Turbo 6.8 14.4

89-91 Turbo 6.5 14.4

95 Twin Turbo 5.2 14.0

Mitsubishi

99 magna V6 8.2 16.2

Holden

VN V6 man 7.9 15.68

VP V6 man 8 15.5

VR V6 auto 9.3 16.8

VN SS 7.4 15.24

VS SS 7.34 15.27

VT SS Gen3 6.4 14.4

VX SS 6.23 14.35

VY SS S1 5.8 14.24

VY SS S2 5.8 13.94

VZ SS 5.82 13.99

HSV

VP GTS 7.2 15.2

VR GTS 6.6 14.8

VX clubsport 5.7 13.9

VX GTS 300 5.1 13.3

VY Clubsport S2 5.3 13.5

Subaru

99 WRX 5.91 14.12

03 WRX 5.8 14

03 STI 5.43 13.62

Ford

EB2 6 9.3 16.8

EL 6 8.9 16.8

AU 6 8.8 16.3

EL XR8 7.5 15.5

BA XR8 6.1 14.1

BA XR6T 5.9 14.1

FPV

Typhoon F6 5.7 14.0

GT 5.9 14.2

Edited by Munna
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80479-0-100-and-0-400m-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No mate. Drag is just dull unless the topfuel/doorslammer cars are running. I CBF hurting my car that way.

RWD's, I know of a slicked up GTSt that runs 10's so it would take me to 100 :P but most of the guys out there are running Jap suspension that just won't grip for the quarter. Even mine is too hard for the launch but good for circuit. Low to mid fives on street rubber is the best I'd expect from a T that is really well sorted as they have to balance revs/boost and wheelspin is just too easy to get.

0-100 4.5 damn best I can manage is 5.2.
It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

 

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Ahh cheeter 4wd wish I had one. Id find it very hard to do 5.2's consistantly with my rwd

Does anyone rate the Gtech for 0-100/0-400 times? I know they can't be exact - but are the newer versions pretty close to the money?

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

just brought one off ebay for $45 the early gtech pro model so when I get it I will let who all know how I go. I will lend it to a few of my mates with quick cars to and compare and list the results.

Nice effort Munna.

Where's my car? :O

I think the Gtech is quite accurrate however some runs may be questionable.

I did a few runs a couple weeks ago. Most were flat 5 but managed one of 4.57 so I doubted it a bit. Haven't taken car out again to confirm.

When it was stock the gtech did produce times which were similar to manufacturer times so I wouldn't say it's impossible to achieve the same results.

Gtech's are great if you want to see if your mods make much difference to the car. My times didn't change after getting the CAT back so it was useless besides the sound, however after getting a tune it gave me a smile.

  • 2 weeks later...
I think your wrong on the r32 gtst 6.9 claim.

In the japanese import buyers guide, the test results of 0-100 times for even an AUTO r32 gts t was 6.89 seconds, and if this was manual the tester expected low 6 second times.

Yep thanks mate did some more research and the time I had was probably for an auto. Found a couple of sites which claim around 6.5 and 14.8.

cheers

  • 3 weeks later...
5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Best I managed in the R32 with the Rb20DET was 5.2, it was consistent and easy to launch.

The RB30DET.. :P Initially I lost 1 whole sec, 6.2, zero traction in first, second is fine providing the change is smooth.

I've since managed to get it down to 5.9secs, the trick was not to over-rev it, change at 5100rpm and its fine. lol, damn small turbo. :huh:

6.9 0-100 for the R32 I think is on the money. Mine was damn slow when 100% stock and making 115rwkw. :blink:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...