Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not a great idea but these are more for longevity rather than response. The bearings add weight to the rotating parts. A good plain bearing should have no contact as it floats in the viscous oil pulled around the journal. It will not last as long though, but well cared for will give a good life.

Interesting.

So a plain bearing turbo would be more responsive than a ball bearing turbo of the exact same size?

I'm curious to know as I have the opportunity to buy a brand new steel wheel'd plain bearing turbo or get a GCG hiflow. The new plain bearing is significantly cheaper though.

I can't work out something ....

is it:

Turbos which keep spinning

OR

Turbos that keep spinning

I guess it depends on whether your car is a twin turbo or a single turbo

:cheers:

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

Cubes , SB8006A CHRA ? . I dug through all the good and not so good GT30 CHRA no's eg 700177-10,11,12,13,14,15,18 and the best 700382-12 . What does that number you gave show or what listing is it from . I've been trying to remember the name of the turbo dealer in north QLD as his site used to have some early Garrett parts lists .

Cheers A

Sorry that last one (GT30R) should have read CHRA no 700177-7 , for turbo assembly no 700382-12 . There are at least 14 GT30 turbine based cartridges I know of and have the part numbers for 11 0f them . Compressors range from GT35 to GT37 to T04S to GT40 .

Cheers A .

Sorry.. I grabbed that number from Ray Hall. His listings appear to be different to that of Garrett them selves. ?!? :wave:

The real part number for the chra is 700177-0014 according to Ray Hall.

I don't understand to be honest as Garrett don't list a GT30R that runs a 64trim comp wheel?!?

Comp: 64trim GT40 comp wheel 2.41(61.21mm)/3.22(81.78mm).

Turbine: 84trim 2.16(54.86mm)/2.36(59.94mm).

I really need to do a bit of reading to understand the trim etc..

One good argument i've seen regarding response, is that the bearing design doesn't matter much, but the blade design does.

IMO its incorrect to attribute the better response of modern turbos solely to the use of ball bearings, because the blade designs are years apart in terms of development.

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

Cheers :D thanks for that GTRgeoff. You may have just saved me $1000 :wave:

Cubes the 700177-14 cartridge should have a 56 trim GT40 compressor on it . Most people call them a GT3040R . HKS did a similar thing but with a 50 trim GT40 compressor wheel .

Turbo bearing systems . The annular contact ball bearings have very little contact area with the inner and outer races . The reason they have small oil restrictors is that high speed ball race bearings suffer drag losses if too much oil is present . Clearence on ball race bearings can be much closer than bush bearings in high speed applications meaning less "orbiting" of the shaft . This allows less clearence between the wheels and housings raising the efficiency of the compressor and energy recovery of the turbine - less slip losses .

What happens with floating bushes in turbos is a large contact area between the turbine shaft and the oil cushon . The large contact area initially gives a drag or oil shear effect that slows the acceleration of the rotating assembly from low speeds - lag . The collar and plate thrust bearing also has the large contact area drag problem . If there is a carbon compressor end seal (mechanical face seal) its more drag again .

The reason turbos with very low drag bearing systems contine to revolve when the engines shut down is because the mass of the rotating assembly has little resistance to revolving for a short time . The lubricating oil is hot and thin as well .

Cost aside I can't think of any good reason to use a bush bearing turbo if a ball bearing alternative is available .

Lastly would you believe me if I said Garretts GTBB turbos have a lower part count than the bush bearing ones ? Believe it .

That all makes sense to me so I won't dispute it except one bit.

As far as the BB part count goes, I assume each bearing cartridge is a single part, where if you said moving parts it would be different.

Well the bearing will add extra mass that resists acceleration, either positive or negative. This in in the form of the rollers/balls (depending on construction) and the inner race over the shaft. I have seen needle rollers in a different low speed application that run on the shaft itself.

Plain bearing application is well advanced, and the shaft basically runs on hydrodynamic oil pressure without contacting metal. The bearing metal is there as a soft surface for when the parts touch, which it will eventually from time to time as the bearing ages.

It's a choice of longevity, but plains last years and many miles when well cared for.

White bearing metal is very expensive to replace also when it wears out

spinning it with your hand would be alot slower than it spins when being pushed by exaust gas. Also doing it once or twice with your fingers wouldnt matter, but doing it everytime you turn your car off, can't be good for it?

yeah thats exactly what i was saying, having exhaust gasses pushing it means there is load behind the turbine wheels, but in this instance the car is off and it keeps spinning because the inertia of the rotating parts is enough to overcome the friction of the bearings. of course the friction will slowly turn the inertia into heat and transfer the energy to the oil and bearings over the period that it keeps spinning after the car is off, once that energy is expended it will stop spinning as its converted all its energy into heat.

now if there was enough energy it can be argued that it will cause damage as there is no longer a proper oil supply, but its not really its a very negligible amount of energy when the engine is off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi everyone, I've been wrestling with this for a while now and have been trying to find out the cause. For context, the turbos used are Garrett 2860 -5s, the BOV is a BNR32 HKS SSQV IV kit, the car is currently tuned to ~470 whp on 17.5 psi. The car drives normally, pulls well when it doesn't happen, and I can replicate it fairly easily. It does not sound like turbo shuffle or flutter. The engine has only a thousand or so miles and has had this behavior since it was completed. After my engine was built for my R32 GTR, I noticed that the car now sometimes makes an air discharge sound on what appears to be positive boost pressure that sounds really similar to a BOV. I had thought that it was a BOV issue but even when replacing it with a brand new unit, the sound persisted. It seems like it's coming from the passenger side but I may be mistaken. The closest scenario I could find was this post here https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/https://www.gtr.co.uk/threads/maybe-a-boost-leak-opinions.147955/ started by @yakshii and it sounds very similar. As in, at partial throttle once I reach positive boost I begin to hear the same psh psh psh psh psh sound like air is leaking somewhere when I keep the throttle in the same position. It most commonly happens in 4th gear at around 3-3.5k RPM and 5th gear around 2.5-3k RPM, which seems to coincide with normal positive boost thresholds. It might be similar to what @Austrian GTR mentioned about his own HKS SSQV. Notable difference would be that when he applies more throttle when it happens, it stops. In my scenario if I apply more throttle during this repeated psh psh psh sound, the cadence of the sound gets faster and louder rather than stopping. If I lift off slightly and apply throttle again, it will normally stop and pull without issue. I've checked all rubber couplers to ensure that they are tight, but have not gotten the opportunity to properly do a pressurized boost leak test. If anyone has had similar experiences or thoughts on what might be the cause, I'd be very keen to hear them. I also have a video of it happening from inside the cabin, if that would make it easier to understand: https://youtu.be/2zqZXcx8jbA
    • I'd want at least $40K for mine, but thats easy to say cos I'm not selling anyway.
    • That's incorrect. We have 4 seasons, consisting of pre winter, winter, post winter and a small glimpse of hope! 
×
×
  • Create New...