Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by XXE-R32

Merli

i dont think anyone takes to kindly to loosing.  

If i ever see this car again, i will be sure to be more careful, infact i dont think i will ever drag again.

Well I don't think that's the right attitude :mad: I think you should be driving straight to your favourite workshop and asking them what your next mod should be, so you can kick that guy's ass the next time you see him (at Eastern Creek of course) :uh-huh:

No-one takes kindly to losing, but calling him a wanker and accusing him of running NOS when you have no idea what modifications he's done to his car is a little over the top IMHO.

As others have said, the "sleeper" look is very popular these days with guys who don't want all that extra Police attention... I guess you're just one more he can chalk up to his ":Owned: List" :thumbsup:

Yes yes yes

i think i might have to take a trip down to my auto shop and spend some dosh.

Your all right he owned my ass, but im sure i will meet him again except next time it will be different, it wont be on a street it will be on a track,

But i still say skylines rule

I’d be wary of green 200sx’s. I know of 3 that look mild but pack a punch. One even had a avo stage 2 cooler that I couldn’t see in broad daylight (I shit you not) plus a 400hp garrett with the 0.6 a/r housing that you couldn’t pick. Chuck on a nice dual muffler jap exhaust with the stock looking tips plus the fuel system/ecu you couldn’t see and there is your 230rwkw 200sx.

Very sneaky customers…

Exactly why the disrespect for NOS users? It's a power adder, functions by stuffing more oxygen and fuel into the chambers, just like a turbo. It has to be set up right, just like a turbo. If you use enough of it you have to build your engine specifically for it - just like a turbo.

Maybe you need some :D

Cheers

J

Well technically, what happens is the nitrous oxide breaks up under the heat and pressure into nitrogen and oxygen, hence the oxygen; and the cooling is a welcome side effect. Also unless you are using a "dry" system (shudders) the nitrous system will add enough fuel so that you don't run lean.

I don't use it BTW, I just don't despise it like a lot of people seem to.

Cheers

J

Originally posted by MRE

One that comes to mind around Brisbane is one with the number plates 5TOCK. Looks stock but eats most cars I have seen him run.

I can get him off the mark but thats it.

I never race....

Unlike some crazy old men. MRE your the burnout master.

My turbo doesn't kick in until 4000rpm. So it bogs down off the line.

MRE, your car is pretty stock. Does damn good burnouts too.

My car wouldn't be very quick down the 1/4 mile. Last time I run CTH15 (red rx7) I could just pull away from him. He ran a high 10. But his car is setup for the 1/4. Gets off the line really well. GTS32 (black r32 gtst with rb26), thats very fast of the street, yet not very good on 1/4.

Even Rodneys Gold supra has beaten subzero try09 on the street. That dupra would be lucky if he got a high 12. But Rod cheats, Try-09 runs out of gears and the dupra just keeps going.

Yep thats my point.

Many cars are set up in different ways.

I think he just had a run in with one that was running a Big Turbo and it just took him a bit get the mumbo down.

I saw "Rodneys Gold supra " in action last Saturday night.

Wheel spining @ 100+..............:burnout: Serious mumbo :)

  • 1 month later...
Guest 570CK
Originally posted by nas77y

570CK - what type of setup have u got?

not a lot.

3" exhaust, Dual Pump Pipe, Apexi AVC-R, GT25 with t04s Compressor, Garrett 16"10"4" bar and plate Intercooler, Modified stock bov, Custom Intercooler piping, Fuel regulator, Audi Motor Sports Fuel Pump, Z32 AFM, 550cc injectors, Auto Meter Gauges, Uni Chip, 2600lbs clutch

Got some more stuff to do..

Guest 570CK
Originally posted by MRE

Yep thats my point.

Many cars are set up in different ways.

I think he just had a run in with one that was running a Big Turbo and it just took him a bit get the mumbo down.

I saw "Rodneys Gold supra " in action last Saturday night.

Wheel spining @ 100+..............:burnout: Serious mumbo ;)

hehe little trick to that. Personally I don't try it cause I'll end up around a pole. Put the clutch in, Rev ya car to 6500rpm while doing 80km/h Change to 2nd or 3rd. Drop ya clutch.. Tell me what happens :)

I did that along smith street one night.. Was showing a mate what rod does. Never again!!! Arse of the car just went completely sideways.. Lucky there was no one next to me, or any parked cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...