Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

17x10 +18 would be my pick for a R33 GTR. 9" +35 is too thin and offset is too high, +18 is a bit better than standard, but if u were going to have a 17x9 id stick with stock R33 GTR rims as they are better quality than the enkeis. 17x9.5 +38 is too high offset, +18 would work, but honestly if i was going to spend the $$ id do it right first time and go 10" wide. gives u more options.

Thanks, I'm having a look around and most tyres that are 255/40/17 or 265/40/17 are a large difference in price, which would be my main reason for going for the 9.5".

However the difference between 9.5 and 10" is about 7mm more sticking out in the 10" and 1mm less clearance, so the 10" is looking more tempting, I *could* run 255/40/17 on a 10" but might be a little stretched....

But I saw this section of this thread and 255 don't look stretched on 10" rims, hmm 10" is looking good.

Skyline model = r33 gtst

Wheel diameter = 20"

Wheel width = 8.5"f 9.5"r

Wheel offset = ?

Tyre size = 225/35/20f 245/35/20r

Modifications to fit = roll guards a little.

sometimes scrubs when turning and hitting bumps together.

post-66323-1252417597_thumb.jpg

post-66323-1252417770_thumb.jpg

Skyline model = r32 gtst

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 8.5

Wheel offset =

Tyre size = 235/40/18

Modifications = car is lower and has the big R33 front brakes

(best pic i could find to show how low it really is) (is the tires and wheels specs above)

any one had a problem with the inner side of the tire scubbing the top of third link front only?

post-64177-1252491220_thumb.jpg

post-64177-1252491388_thumb.png

Edited by nissans52

Skyline model = '97 R33 GTST

Wheel diameter = 17

Wheel width =8s, 9s

Wheel offset =+40 +40

Tyre size = 235/45

Modifications to fit = None

Fit good. May consider 10mm or 20mm spacers at some point after I lower it a bit. May go for a lower profile tyre also.,

Edited by Battery_backup

hey mrbenno,

can u email me at [email protected] ?

sorry im not able to send u a private message as im still new.. im interested to see how your emotions look on your gtr32, as im planning to get thjose too, same size offset and width..

thanks

Skyline model = 1989 R32 GT-R

Wheel Brand = Work Emotion XT7

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 9.5"

Wheel offset = 20

Tyre size = 245/40/18

Modifications to fit = None.

Car is quite low, as low as a set of super low springs if you had them. ( I have Teins)

32GTR1.jpg

32GTR2.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...