Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I ended up swapping my CR Kai's for Buddyclub P1 Qf's. My only concern now is that I've gone from a +22 to a +17 and haven't had a chance to trial fit. Will they fit ok? Will I have an issue if I want to upgrade to bigger brakes in the future?

shouldnt be an issue but depending on size of brakes? are rims 17 or 18s?

Come with 16's

Yeah, even 265's may be a sqeeze. I got 245 running on 10.5 and it has decent stretch, but not too excessive. 265 is the optimum size (I do believe) for 10's. Do 32 Rs come with 17's from stock?

I ended up swapping my CR Kai's for Buddyclub P1 Qf's. My only concern now is that I've gone from a +22 to a +17 and haven't had a chance to trial fit. Will they fit ok? Will I have an issue if I want to upgrade to bigger brakes in the future?

Assuming same width rim and tyre size, you are just going to poke 5mm more. No real issue if the others were a decent fit.

Need some help in finding the right offset and fitment for my 4 door r32 help would be greatly appreciated was looking at 17 maybe 18 x 9.5 with a +26 offset for my fronts and the the rears a 10.5 with 0 offset any help would be greatly appreciated the rear has been flaired out a little cheers

Need some help in finding the right offset and fitment for my 4 door r32 help would be greatly appreciated was looking at 17 maybe 18 x 9.5 with a +26 offset for my fronts and the the rears a 10.5 with 0 offset any help would be greatly appreciated the rear has been flaired out a little cheers

fronts wont be to much of an issue...rears will be a problem

18x9.5 +12 all round on my 32 (font guards are 25mm wider)

post-2127-0-80210900-1349254434_thumb.jpg

post-2127-0-86429400-1349254497_thumb.jpg

Edited by Frosty

the the rears a 10.5 with 0 offset any help would be greatly appreciated the rear has been flaired out a little cheers

18x10.5+0

Wow. Well you are looking at around 45mm outside the guards, if not more. That is an awful fitment choice, even with the flared guards. Maybe go for 9.5+26 all round.

yeah will fit without any issues

was a mate using my account and no they wont clear the brakes, the wheels were SSR reverse mesh which need a 25mm bolt on to clear 4 pots

ps: anyone got pics of 33 coupe's with r33 gtr's on rear lowered with natural camber? need to know what size bolt on to run to bring the wheel out to the guard, will have around 4 degrees camber and 215/45's

Edited by Kris..

Not Sure if i have put up full specs ect of my wheels so here it is

Skyline model = R33 GTST

Wheel diameter = 15"

Wheel width = 10"

Wheel offset = -26

Tyre size = 195/50 & 205/50

Modifications to try and make them fit = Rolled front and rear guards also pulled the rear guards, as you can see still mexicanr33new11111.jpg1348289833475ed.jpg

1348561845632ed.jpg

was a mate using my account and no they wont clear the brakes, the wheels were SSR reverse mesh which need a 25mm bolt on to clear 4 pots

ps: anyone got pics of 33 coupe's with r33 gtr's on rear lowered with natural camber? need to know what size bolt on to run to bring the wheel out to the guard, will have around 4 degrees camber and 215/45's

reversh mesh would be an issue...

4deg of camber on the front or rear?

Have 4 pot r 32 gtr calipers on the front and want some dish on the front and rears the rims I am looking at are work vs kf

Make sure you get R type (work sell A, O and R type) for the front to clear the brakes. O type on the rear for maximum dish however work no longer makes VS-KF so will have to be 2nd hand unless Leo (JDM Concept) has some in stock

Not Sure if i have put up full specs ect of my wheels so here it is

Skyline model = R33 GTST

Wheel diameter = 15"

Wheel width = 10"

Wheel offset = -26

Tyre size = 195/50 & 205/50

Modifications to try and make them fit = Rolled front and rear guards also pulled the rear guards, as you can see still mexicanr33new11111.jpg1348289833475ed.jpg

1348561845632ed.jpg

more low required :)

standard 33 GTR's are 17x9 +30 so what are you trying to achieve here? what is -4?? offset or camber?

hes talking -4 degrees camber on the rear. and has R33 gtr wheels. which as you said are 17x9 +30, and wants to add spacers to add more poke. which in my opinion is unnecessary. but then, im not mexican.

4 degrees is a silly amount of rear camber......mine has mininal camber(not sure how much) but already very slippery compared to stock

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...