Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just put the rims on only just fit, will be rolling the guards.

Question, how close are everyones tyres to the struts, looks a little to close???

Will 265 help that much??/

offset 40+

Thanks

No, the reason yours is so close to the strut is because you have an awful offset. I wouldn't run them until you get some spacers.. Chuck the stockies back on, roll all your guards, and push them out another 20mm or more (depending how mexican you want).

hubcentric BOLT ON spacers... but those rims may not have the capacity to run them, show us a photo of the inside of the rims before you go buying spacers.

It might work out cheaper to buy better fitting rims and sell them

Skyline model = R34GTT

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 8"

Wheel offset = ?

Tyre size = 285/40/18

Just put some new rubber on.

They fit just.... can anyone point me in the direction of a good mobile guard roller?

0098sm.jpg

Cheers

Edited by TTR34

Skyline model = R34GTT

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width = 8"

Wheel offset = ?

Tyre size = 285/40/18

Just put some new rubber on.

They fit just.... can anyone point me in the direction of a good mobile guard roller?

0098sm.jpg

Cheers

285's on an 8 inch rim?? Bit excessive there don't you think?

sif u buy meisters to run a spacer! you are not worthy :P

Haha - I know but ssssshhhhhh. When dealing with 20 inch Meisters the ability to pick sizes and offsets ceased in like 07 when they were discontinued. Now we all must deal and perserve with the choices others made in the first instance :( It's only my fronts I want to tease out a little more...

shits me i cannot get the 10.5 with the wheels I want. what does a 10.5 +30 translate to with a 9.5 inch rim. What offset should i get to match the same flushness as a 10.5 +30 wheel.

Skyline model = R34 GTT

Wheel diameter = 18

Wheel width = 9.5 +22 fronts, 9.5 + ??????rears

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...