Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

also, 1 add says unknown k's then in the more expensive ad he boasts about the low kms, and even tells you that the dash was changed at 50k and now has 33k so it sounds like he knows the exact k's

he is also slightly negotiable....maybe slightly means $7k

It was advertised for 19.5K without rwc or compliance. But now claims to have been sold for 19K. I wish I could buy and sell a car that I don't even own that fast lol.

Nice pic in the ad there now:

http://firesport.ipspace.com/item_images/24585.jpg

Good on him!

If he was quick enough to be the first person to spot a bargin and then smart enough to make a $7k profit, in a very short time, good luck to him.

Having not read his ad, I just hope he/she did not bs to the person that bought the car.

Also details can be obtained after the car is bought.

Car was sold and has been onsold, it happens a lot with the cars we list (and mostly those that we don't list). We've got a few legitimate businesses that buy cars through us and then onsell it for a lot more, and some private individuals who do it to make some money on the side. What they do with a car after they buy it is none of our business, we get paid to find people cars and help em import it.

We actually had 6 people contact us within 1/2 hour of that email being sent out wanting to buy it.

PS. the limited edition R34 GTR was midnight Purple III. Still the R32's a sweet lookin car though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...