Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 517
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Here's a few pictures that my younger brother took using a Canon Powershot Pro 1 8.0MP Camera. Original pictures were 3264 x 2448 pixels in size, resized down to 800 x 600 for this post. First three pictures are taken of Parliment House and other sights, the last three were taken at the Botanic Gardens in Canberra, ACT.

IMG_0569800x600.jpg

IMG_0568800x600.jpg

IMG_0551800x600.jpg

IMG_0026800x600.jpg

IMG_0024800x600.jpg

MystSun800x600.jpg

Nath

Edited by NathR32
I had to share this with you  lot who loves photography.

GOOD STUFF!!! DREAM JOB!! for sure :)

Click here

god you got that right mr glue :) some of the pics are just well yeah beyound words.... :P I am gob smacked

got one more of mine to add was taken a few months back on the queensland byron bay dawn cruze.

This guy was sitting out on this rock for well over a hour & did not move I call the photo

"Lost In Prayer"

post-146-1128094248.jpg

"Sun Rise On Love"

post-146-1128094295.jpg

errrm, over-exposed? everyone else that's seen it has said it looks fine? *confused*

I'm not trying to pick on you, but you put "xmetal photography" on the bottom of the photo, so I figure I should help you out before you do this for someone else and they're unsatisfied with your work.

The bottom and side of the R isn't meant to be white is it?

and the car is white, but its blown out of proportion, and its pretty much blended in with the side of the R badge.

if the car was clean, you wouldn't be able to see any depth in the photo at all

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...