Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I am interested in up grading my turbo! I know there is allot of skyline running round with these GT30r or the GT35r! I’m a big fan of this turbo but allot of people I have talked to that have them there not hitting boost until like 4800rpm and in a gtst you only basically have till 7000rpm! I want a turbo smaller than this that is capable of making 300rwkw if I want but something that will come on boost earlier and chop a skyline with a gt30r!

Any suggestions or info would be appreciated

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/
Share on other sites

Grab a VG30 or similiar sized turbine housing, machine it up to suit a GT30 -12 CHRA with a .6 comp cover. + a set of cams and you will get very very close to 300rwkw. That should come on hard just before 4k.

The only way to really drop spool times more is to drop the head on a rb30 block.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/#findComment-1568669
Share on other sites

I personally think that what you're requesting is stupid.

quick option - NOS

the only way to spin up a big turbo quickly is to have more exhaust gases.

to do this, apart from Nitrous, you need more capacity.

Sure cams will help and timing and tuning and the hey and the hoe..

but using a 3L bottom end as discussed in the 137 page thread up there (points to the top of the forum), you will be able to spin up this turbo with ease.

but you don't seem to have a proper goal in mind.

you jump from 300rwkw to beating an RB25 with the same turbo to having no lag..

so there's probably no helping ya..

Edited by GTST
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/#findComment-1569085
Share on other sites

the current mods i have are turbo back 3.5inch exhaust, fmic, avcr, Gtr fuel pump and a fully rebuilt engine with forged internals could go into detail about the rebuild but wont and my 555cc and pfc are on the way! yer i just want a good turbo and come's on boost early and produce round the 300rwkw! price is not an issue!

Edited by al_r33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/#findComment-1569218
Share on other sites

price not an issue?

ok do an rb30 bottom end

change and 740cc injectors

change to gt35r

get a suitable external wastegate

get a suitable manifold

4" exhaust

get some suspension work done probably a complete whileline works kit

get some 265 tyres or semi slicks

change to 040 fuel pump

probably want to look at fuel rail too

youll need a bigger airflow meter probably q45

your clutch will get fried as well so change clutch

probably want a good cold air intake with such a larger amount of air coming into the system

dont rev to 7000rpm with the rb30 bottom end more realistic would be 6000rpm as it wont make any more power and will have issues with the harmonic balancer

i am by no means an expert (far from it actually) so you would be better to speak to a tuner and work out a realistic goal

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/#findComment-1569558
Share on other sites

Actually there is a couple of options in the GT30 turbine based range , just maybe not common or cheap .

There is a version of the HKS GT3037 which has a 52 trim compressor rather than the 56 trim comp version which is the same as the GT30R . The 52 trim version comes with a .50 ARR non port shrouded comp cover (housing) instead of the 56 trims .60ARR port shrouded comp cover .

52 trim CHRA no 700177-0006 , turbo no 700382-0009 or -0010

56 trim CHRA no 700177-0007 , turbo no 700382-0011 or -0012

Second option is the propper GT30 turbine version of the GT3071R CHRA no

700177-0023 . This uses the 56 trim GT35 71.1mm comp and has the same compressor flow capacity as the 48 trim version of the HKS GT3037 but with higher efficiency and less innertia to accelerate . The GT37 compressors in 3037's (48/52/56T) and GT30R (56T) are 76mm .

So two options , the 3037 52 trim and the GT3071R generally use the same type of comp cover so appear the same externally .

Your call , cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/86817-turbo-questions/#findComment-1569798
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...