Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Heres my Dyno Sheet what do you all think??

Just wondering on how to read the air feul ratio on this graph.

Does it start at 11.5 or at 12.5.

Also what would you consider running lean or running rich.

Neways thoughts would be helpfull.

The car is a R32 GTSt wit Bolts ons running 12psi

Cheers,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Ummm:

3" Zorst

Pod

Splitfire coil packs

Slightly bigger turbo unsure of what kind maybe VG30?? hasnt been looked at yet 2 many pipes.

Any idea on whats rich and whats lean

For example is 11:1 Rich or lean???

Is it the higher the first number the richer?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1579922
Share on other sites

A:F ratio = Air:Fuel

11:1 = 11 parts air : 1 part fuel.

11.5:1 is a safe setting.

when your car runs lean, it has HIGHER parts of AIR per part of FUEL.

so if you see things like 12.5:1 or higher, then you could end up in trouble.

I wouldn't like to see anything leaner than 12:1

that's why I said 11.5:1 that you currently have is a good safe reliable setting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1580273
Share on other sites

you're better off taking it that high while on the dyno so that the tuner can make sure that there is enough fuel capacity till the rev limiter.

cause if you miss shift or something while racing say, then you might hit the limiter and maybe not have the tuning there and cause some major damage..

at least on a dyno, he can see it getting there and back off if required.

so it IS worth it.

and it seems that your dyno run was done in 3rd gear right?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1594397
Share on other sites

Hmm theres a fair few opinions on whats a good afr. I'd like mine to be 11.8:1 or 12:1, nothing leaner than that. Just incase of a boost spike or something unnatural happening.

I thought dyno runs were best done in 4th gear due to there almost 1:1 gear ratio?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1595600
Share on other sites

I've said it many times. :D

Ceramic turbine wheels absolutely hate high exhaust gas temperatures.

Leaner AFR = higher exhaust gas temp.

Less ignition timing = higher exhaust gas temp.

Slightly richer = lower exhaust gas temp.

As its slightly richer you can dial in a little more ignition timing.

More ignition timing = lower exhaust gas temp.

Slightly richer, around ~11.5:1 + more ignition timing = the same power but a safer same power due to a lower exhaust gas temp.

Notice how a lot of the 300rwkw+ RB's at points in the rev range run a 11:1. Its all about reliability, bugger running it leaner when it may cost you 4k if not more for a motor rebuild.

12.5 is definitely a little lean. What happens when that fuel filter becomes a little blocked? 13:1, especially if its on stock injectors up around 200rwkw.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/87507-dyno-results/#findComment-1595885
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...