Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just got a quick question

Quickest time last night was 11.9 @ 114.5 mph.

That mph seems a bit low. I ran a 118 previously. Anyone have any ideas? I think i actually dropped (accidentally) the boost level to 1.2 bar or lower for this run.

Was that your highest mph for the night...?

When did you run the 118 mph with what setup...?

You gained 3 mph compared to a run with 313 awkw..?

Is your clutch healthy...?

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

highest mph was 117.5mph

I ran that with the same setup but different tune.

I gained 3 mph compared to my quickest run with crd's tune (306awkw)

My clutch is brand new and doesnt slip

I lost mph through the night once i started 'adjusting' my boost controller

Gee theres a lot of people in this thread?

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

Yeah, thats me

Makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside eh? :P

In regards to my tune those who brought it up, I'll be having it QA'd back at BEL again shortly, to ensure that everything is in line. I've a feeling as blk180 said the exhaust was restricting it and now that I've changed that I've a feeling it does need to be tuned to suit.

Congrats on a 11 TommyK good to hear....

Ahh...so the green TO4z-ified BNR32 is Morgs'...

Apparently our 2 cars are the most powerful cars that have ever been on Jason's dyno.

Great to see you and Jerry at the drags last night Tommyk, we'll have to organise a night in the near future for SAU as I'd love to race a couple of these big power GTR's

That would be good and see if we can get a few more gtrs there as well . By the way my car DOES not have big power , actualy its fairly stock , Just the baby gtss's ,( to scared to keep the stockers ) power f/c and a small bore ( barely 3") exhaust .

Everything else is stock .

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

Emre,

Im not quoting any kw figures here. I'm comparing my previous 1/4 TS to my current quickest TS. Based on the same equipment in the car. I dont know how many kw my car has, and i dont care.

Once i have the boost properly configured to hit 1.3 bar, I will have another few runs and see how we go. But based upon what i saw:

My 60 ft time on the 11.9 was 1.8

My best 60ft time was 1.72, which was done with more boost

My quickest mph with 1.2-1.25 bar boost was 117.5mph.

If i can do a 11.9 @ 114.5 mph, then if i launch with a 60ft time of 1.72 @ run 118-119 mph, i should be down to 11.6 ?

Geez im cluttering up this thread. Sorry Ben

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

I think what Tommyk is trying to say is that he has no idea how much power the car has now (or before), but it is reasonable to assume that it has 30hp more than it had before.

That would be good and see if we can get a few more gtrs there as well . By the way my car DOES not have big power , actualy its fairly stock , Just the baby gtss's ,( to scared to keep the stockers ) power f/c and a small bore ( barely 3") exhaust .

Everything else is stock .

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :P any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :P any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

Hey Bu5ter, I hear you've got a new setup in your car with a new computer, turbo and dump pipe? Are you going to Bell and see the difference with the old times you ran? I suppose with such small changes you wouldn't be hoping for much of a gain over you're old high 11, which I personally think you fluked. Timing lights were on the blink or something...

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :O any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

The reason i went the gtss's is because i wanted to retain a responsive car. The 34 r's are very responsive with the stockers and i could have about the same power with them but wasnt game to keep them just in case they let go and then take the donk with them too .

If i wanted power , i would go much bigger turbos and some cams , dumps , bigger bore exhaust , airflow meters , injectors , fuel , pump and even more .

My car would only make about 230 awkw but thats how i like it !!

TommyK I'm Glad you got what you wanted from BEL :) Ben is a top guy and had my car moving!!!!

The whole reason for this thread and the info I have tried to put out in an un-biased way is that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat!

I went to CRD and got the CAM timing that I knew would have a gain in my particular case (rebuilt motor with poncoms etc etc) ....

At this stage Ben doesn't do cam timing, as the dyno room and dyno are not complete (not for a lack of trying mind you!!!!)

I am sure as I am alive that with time, and more GT-Rs through the shop, they will also be able to eek out the idiosyncrastic ways of the RB26 engine as has CRD... its all about time with your head over an engine bay in a dyno so to speak....

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene ;) as it is were the passion is :):)

Marko.....

when I am back for work, you will have to take me for a spin :O

Morgs.....

get it to the track son!

okbye

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene :) as it is were the passion is :O:)

You recon? You need to come to melbourne then :) Just ask Roy, he should know he's been all over.

ben,

im only a phone call away - call me when ur next in syd!

marko

TommyK I'm Glad you got what you wanted from BEL :) Ben is a top guy and had my car moving!!!!

The whole reason for this thread and the info I have tried to put out in an un-biased way is that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat!

I went to CRD and got the CAM timing that I knew would have a gain in my particular case (rebuilt motor with poncoms etc etc) ....

At this stage Ben doesn't do cam timing, as the dyno room and dyno are not complete (not for a lack of trying mind you!!!!)

I am sure as I am alive that with time, and more GT-Rs through the shop, they will also be able to eek out the idiosyncrastic ways of the RB26 engine as has CRD... its all about time with your head over an engine bay in a dyno so to speak....

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene ;) as it is were the passion is :):)

Marko.....

when I am back for work, you will have to take me for a spin :O

Morgs.....

get it to the track son!

okbye

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...