Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just got a quick question

Quickest time last night was 11.9 @ 114.5 mph.

That mph seems a bit low. I ran a 118 previously. Anyone have any ideas? I think i actually dropped (accidentally) the boost level to 1.2 bar or lower for this run.

Was that your highest mph for the night...?

When did you run the 118 mph with what setup...?

You gained 3 mph compared to a run with 313 awkw..?

Is your clutch healthy...?

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

highest mph was 117.5mph

I ran that with the same setup but different tune.

I gained 3 mph compared to my quickest run with crd's tune (306awkw)

My clutch is brand new and doesnt slip

I lost mph through the night once i started 'adjusting' my boost controller

Gee theres a lot of people in this thread?

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

Yeah, thats me

Makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside eh? :P

In regards to my tune those who brought it up, I'll be having it QA'd back at BEL again shortly, to ensure that everything is in line. I've a feeling as blk180 said the exhaust was restricting it and now that I've changed that I've a feeling it does need to be tuned to suit.

Congrats on a 11 TommyK good to hear....

Ahh...so the green TO4z-ified BNR32 is Morgs'...

Apparently our 2 cars are the most powerful cars that have ever been on Jason's dyno.

Great to see you and Jerry at the drags last night Tommyk, we'll have to organise a night in the near future for SAU as I'd love to race a couple of these big power GTR's

That would be good and see if we can get a few more gtrs there as well . By the way my car DOES not have big power , actualy its fairly stock , Just the baby gtss's ,( to scared to keep the stockers ) power f/c and a small bore ( barely 3") exhaust .

Everything else is stock .

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

Emre,

Im not quoting any kw figures here. I'm comparing my previous 1/4 TS to my current quickest TS. Based on the same equipment in the car. I dont know how many kw my car has, and i dont care.

Once i have the boost properly configured to hit 1.3 bar, I will have another few runs and see how we go. But based upon what i saw:

My 60 ft time on the 11.9 was 1.8

My best 60ft time was 1.72, which was done with more boost

My quickest mph with 1.2-1.25 bar boost was 117.5mph.

If i can do a 11.9 @ 114.5 mph, then if i launch with a 60ft time of 1.72 @ run 118-119 mph, i should be down to 11.6 ?

Geez im cluttering up this thread. Sorry Ben

Righto, i was bit confused there. :P

So your best mph with 306 awkw is 114.x mph.

Your best mph with Bell tune which you think is 32x awkw is 117 mph.

FYI, 117 mph has been done by many with stock turbos and 260 rwkw.

My best with that power is 116 mph with 1700 kgs racing weight.

No stirring ot bragging is intended.

I think what Tommyk is trying to say is that he has no idea how much power the car has now (or before), but it is reasonable to assume that it has 30hp more than it had before.

That would be good and see if we can get a few more gtrs there as well . By the way my car DOES not have big power , actualy its fairly stock , Just the baby gtss's ,( to scared to keep the stockers ) power f/c and a small bore ( barely 3") exhaust .

Everything else is stock .

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :P any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :P any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

Hey Bu5ter, I hear you've got a new setup in your car with a new computer, turbo and dump pipe? Are you going to Bell and see the difference with the old times you ran? I suppose with such small changes you wouldn't be hoping for much of a gain over you're old high 11, which I personally think you fluked. Timing lights were on the blink or something...

Damn most people dream of upgraded HKS turbos, new ecu and exhaust, the car is far from stock :O any other mods are really only for peace of mind rather then power anyway

The reason i went the gtss's is because i wanted to retain a responsive car. The 34 r's are very responsive with the stockers and i could have about the same power with them but wasnt game to keep them just in case they let go and then take the donk with them too .

If i wanted power , i would go much bigger turbos and some cams , dumps , bigger bore exhaust , airflow meters , injectors , fuel , pump and even more .

My car would only make about 230 awkw but thats how i like it !!

TommyK I'm Glad you got what you wanted from BEL :) Ben is a top guy and had my car moving!!!!

The whole reason for this thread and the info I have tried to put out in an un-biased way is that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat!

I went to CRD and got the CAM timing that I knew would have a gain in my particular case (rebuilt motor with poncoms etc etc) ....

At this stage Ben doesn't do cam timing, as the dyno room and dyno are not complete (not for a lack of trying mind you!!!!)

I am sure as I am alive that with time, and more GT-Rs through the shop, they will also be able to eek out the idiosyncrastic ways of the RB26 engine as has CRD... its all about time with your head over an engine bay in a dyno so to speak....

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene ;) as it is were the passion is :):)

Marko.....

when I am back for work, you will have to take me for a spin :O

Morgs.....

get it to the track son!

okbye

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene :) as it is were the passion is :O:)

You recon? You need to come to melbourne then :) Just ask Roy, he should know he's been all over.

ben,

im only a phone call away - call me when ur next in syd!

marko

TommyK I'm Glad you got what you wanted from BEL :) Ben is a top guy and had my car moving!!!!

The whole reason for this thread and the info I have tried to put out in an un-biased way is that there is more than 1 way to skin a cat!

I went to CRD and got the CAM timing that I knew would have a gain in my particular case (rebuilt motor with poncoms etc etc) ....

At this stage Ben doesn't do cam timing, as the dyno room and dyno are not complete (not for a lack of trying mind you!!!!)

I am sure as I am alive that with time, and more GT-Rs through the shop, they will also be able to eek out the idiosyncrastic ways of the RB26 engine as has CRD... its all about time with your head over an engine bay in a dyno so to speak....

Even now I am interstate I will be keeping a close eye on the whole NSW GT-R scene ;) as it is were the passion is :):)

Marko.....

when I am back for work, you will have to take me for a spin :O

Morgs.....

get it to the track son!

okbye

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...