Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For all those that have been thinking about getting braided brake lines to reduce the expansion rubber hoses can have under big brake pressure, there is an interesting article on Autospeed this week http://autospeed.com/cms/A_2679/article.html

"Well, the first hose we tested was an old and worn rubber hose (which appears to be the original part from a ’65 Ford Mustang). In static conditions, this hose had an OD of 10.76mm and, when pressurised, it expanded to 11.02mm. An increase of 2.4 percent.

Next, we tested a brand new rubber hose. The new hose had a 10.47mm OD which expanded to 10.65mm when pressurised. An increase of 1.7 percent.

The final test was a new braided steel brake line. In static conditions, the braided line had an OD of 6.45mm and expanded to 6.49mm when pressurised. An increase of less than 1 percent."

0.7% difference in exansion between rubber and braided lines at 3500psi (about twice what you could actually generate). Considering the price is about 3 - 4 times as much......just buy new rubber hoses.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90013-braided-or-rubber-brake-hoses/
Share on other sites

Can I ask what might be a stupid question. Percentages are nice and all, but in real life what does that percentage mean, like, is that 0.5% in expansion a bit increase or not?

Also remember whatever it is its x4.

3 - 4 times as much??? pffft. The braided hose we got from Maltech were marginally more expensive than Nissan hoses. They cost around $350 for a set of 4. I purchased a pair of genuine Nissan front hoses at $90 EACH.

3 - 4 times as expensive. PFFFTT!

yeah the genuine rubber ones are more expensive these days. i bought a set of nismo braided lines for 10 000 yen (about $130). they were very nice too.

the expansion measurement as a percentage is interesting too. the fact is the old rubber expanded .26mm where as the braided line only expanded .04. that is quite a difference among 4 lines (well six really on the GTR).

well I lost the receipt for my rubber lines in the mountain of receipts I have. But any decent brake shop can make up brake lines for you much cheaper, you don't need to use the Nissan ones.

And I can assure you that my pedal feel is brilliant with the new rubber hoses :P

the nismo ones, were they $130 a corner?

nah, $130 for all 6. they are really nice too. Teflon lines, covered with stainless braid, then sheathed in teflon (or it may be silicone) to protect them. Without something covering the braid you can get problems as over time bits of dirt and grit can work their way into the gaps in the braid then slowing wear away at the line inside.

edit: I should mention that i bought them in japan on the cheap. I think the retail in japan is about 15 000 yen, and over here they are probably about $300 a set. still a good deal i reckon even at that price. particulary if bens maltech ones were $500 :P

I had braided lines on my 32 when it arrived, though for compliance reasons had to take them off. MASSIVE difference in feel of pedal. Was quite shocked, i thought the brand new lines i got made up would be very similar. Will hopefully go back to braided lines at some stage. It cost excactly twice as much for braided lines as rubber ones when i got quote. PS Have set of HKS sports braided lines for sale.

Guys please correct me if I have it wrong, but the way I see it, if hose A expands by 1.7% and hose B expands by 1%, then the conclusion is that hose A expands 70% more than B, not a .7% difference...?

So 1/1.7 = braided has only 60% of the expansion that rubber does?

Also keep in mind that the tests where probably done at room temperature not at the temperatures often seen by brake hoses (you should all know rubber gets softer with heat). Also with braided hoses being silver wouldn't they be less susceptible to transfering heat to the brake fluid.

Carlos

I think it's just a case of the journalist having some space to fill in and not actually understanding what's going on.

I have been involved and done similar tests and i know how to manipulate percentages, just measuring the expansion of the hose is not good enough. If you are going to do this type of test you must ensure each hose is the same length and new (not like the rubber hose shown). Also the machine used to do the test as shown in the article is not adequate for this type of testing, it keeps pumping pressure until its reaches it set pressure, the way it should be done is see what force is required to reach a certain pressure this will tell you how much the pressure the hose is absorbing. I’m certain a braided hose will out perform a rubber hose anytime.

omrae it sounds like you know what you are talking about....

Now I agree in total braided lines will be better than rubber....the question is, how much better.

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

If a new rubber line really does increase only 0.7% more than a braided one does, I am willing to bet that no-one could actually tell the difference on the track :)

I'll make up some number just for the sake of simplicity.

Assume the OD of the hose is 10mm.

If hose A expands to 11mm and hose B expands to 15mm:

Hose A has increased by 10%

Hose B has increased by 50%

Hose B has not increased 40% more than A, it has increased 5 times that of A.

What I'm getting at is, the rubber hose increased by 1.7%, braided >1.0%, therefore the rubber hose has increased by nearly twice what the braided line did.

cowie165 I agree mathematically 1.7% is almost twice the expansion of 1% but thats not really the point....the difference in total diameter is 1% or 1.7% which lets face it is bugger all as a percentage of total diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The final part arrived today to un-clampify and simplify the intake Who would have though a 1/2" hose stainless bulkhead fitting designed for below waterline bilge pumps would be what I needed Test fit on a 3" offcut I had laying around to see if it would work, and it worked a treat All going well the intake will be on its "final version" tomorrow 
    • Good luck on the weekend mate
    • Must have been an absolute nightmare to drive when the power steer was out, the rack ratio/wheel size/caster is all set up for power assistance
    • Welcome to SAU, what are you looking at buying?
    • I checked the injectors again (1 and 2, since they’re easiest to access) to make sure they weren’t clogged. Even though the entire fuel system had been cleaned, I wanted to be certain. Everything looked clean, so I reinstalled and connected everything. When I started the car to confirm everything was okay, it immediately revved up high, so I shut it off straight away. I checked to see if I’d missed a vacuum hose or something, but everything was connected. On the second attempt, the car ran without the high idle, but I noticed a distinct “compressed air” sound coming from the engine bay. Tracing the sound, I pushed injector #6 forward slightly and the noise stopped — it turned out it wasn’t seated properly, despite the fuel rail being bolted down. While holding it in place, the car idled steadily without stalling and ran for over 5 minutes. At this point, I pulled all six injectors out just in case I hadn’t seated them correctly or dirt had gotten onto the O-rings. Unfortunately, I discovered that I had damaged 3 out of 6 injectors (the OEM 270cc ones) during installation. So yes, this was my fault. Since only the pintle caps were damaged, I’ve ordered a Fuel Injector Service Kit from NZEFI to refurbish them. In the meantime, I reinstalled my new injectors – the car now idles fine for over 15 minutes without stalling. I have not attempted to drive it so far. It’s not perfect yet, as it hesitates when the throttle is pressed, but it’s a big improvement. Unplugging the IACV with the new injectors idles at around 800rpm, even with the IACV screw tightened fully. But this is probably due to tune.
×
×
  • Create New...