Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im looking at a 33 gtr, im just wondering, whats the build quality like in these cars? are they solid?

also are they reliable? do they require much maintenence? do they need much work if theyre near standard (ecu, exhaust, filter)

what are some common problems in r33 gtr's?

also what do you think is the best way to buy? imported or buy from someone private?

how does the r33 drive? is a good street car? can it go one track? how does it compare to say an evo 7?

cheers

Build quality is good. The RB is very strong and mod friendly.

Reliable depends how well maintainted it is and how far you push it. its a sliding scale.

if its near standard doens't need much more work than any other car. oil changes every 5,000ks with good oil etc....

Common problems, dont really know... make sure you get a compression/leakdown test before buying... don't pay any attention to km's on the clock most imports have been wound back.

Would you feel comfortable blowing ~40k on a car you've never seen or driven? i know i wouldn't, i'd prefer to buy local first, but if you can't find what you're after local you could look to import...

I drive my R33 GTR to work daily and track it on club track days without changing anything, drive on track, race drive home etc... but mine is pretty standard...

evo7 never driven one can't say sorry.

To give you some idea, stage 1 mods on a GTR includes exaust/cam gears/ecu/more boost on std turbos and you'll make about 250rwkw.

i would say the gts-t is a much better street car than the gtr

The gtr is more of a track car. It is laggier in stock form than the gts-t is.

The evo 7 is a much newer car and you will probably find them to be in better condition than the r33 gtr

Build quality RB26DETTs are great engines. The only downfall with the GTRs are maybe the maintainence costs. You got 2 turbos to look out for. It is an AWD so many more moving mechanisms?

Near stock standard they are really fast enough. Zorst, ECU, injectors, up boost and you can go pretty damn fast.

If it is a daily, then you might need to look out for fuel consumption. They take quite a bit of fuel.

Not many GTRs that are for sale now therefore choices are minimal. You can try importing one :D

I was under the impression that if you were too Import a car it would be considerably Cheaper than buying one in Australia.

Aka - 40k for a 33 GTR in AuS

-20-30k For a 33 GTR from Japan

Obviously you flip a coin to see if you get a good one or a Lemon from Japan but am I wrong about pricing?

ive been doing alot of hunting, it seems imports are alot cheaper, so i guess this just means we need a broker that can be trusted, and looks at the car over there inside out and maybe even does mecanical tests? is there such thing? i think imports101 does something like this, anyone else?

GEARBOX SYNCHROS.......the 33 GTR seems to eat synchros, you probably won't notice it on a test drive as it only seems to occur once the gearbox is very hot (and believe me it gets fooking hot, girlfriend thought I kept leaving the heater on), the upside is that it heats your drafty garage :P You will likely notice the gears crunching from 3rd to 4th or 4th to 5th. There is a temporary fix which involves using Redline Heavy Shockproof gear oil but ultimatley you'd need to have the gearbox out and replace synchros (they're only a couple of hundred bucks but it's the labour that kills). Other than that watch out for fake V Spec's and very standard cars as they're sometimes ex raced ones that have had standard bits put back in. Don't let these things put you off though, I've had mine for 10 months now and I absolutely love it, it only cost as much to run as you want new shiny go faster bits!! I'm addicted to modification so spend all my expendable income on it....with no regrets :)

G'day mate,

I found this stock '96 HR33 GTR V-Spec down in Sydney, pretty good price compared to what I've seen around, thought it might interest you if you're looking at buying one locally (I was going to but my loan requires the car to be 8 years or younger :rolleyes:).

Click here

Question, does anyone know the kw of a stock HR33 GTR? Or of all Skyline models?

Cheers.

Edited by SHT HOT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...