Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya all,

I've been toying with the idea of getting a stock rear bar (R32), and having the 'SKYLINE' part of it light up at night...

I went to a custom bodykit manufacturer, and he reckons I could use a belt sander to shave the letters off from the inside, because of the indentation on the letters. Alternatively, if that doesn't work, then I might have to sit down with a die grinder and do it all VERY carefully! If i slip up just once, it will ruin the whole thing ;)

Then I would need to put a perspex sheet behind it, and seal it so its watertight. Then just run a couple of globes from the rear lights to it, so it comes on with the lights. If I angle the lights right, it should light up the entire sheet of perspex, if you all know how perspex reacts to light :D

Kind of hard to explain what I'm getting at, but if you use your imagination, I think it will be a worthwhile mod - would also give all of these used R32 rear bars a new lease on life! :D Can put all sorts of colours through it, or even use a multi-coloured neon with colour selector in the cabin.

It's bound to set one 32 apart from another, and that's what it's all about, in an age dominated by BN kits and Vertex bars. B)

I've got a few other crazy ideas on mucking around with 32s, if anyone cares to hear 'em...

Adrian.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91513-custom-r32-skyline-light-up-trick/
Share on other sites

Heya all,

I've been toying with the idea of getting a stock rear bar (R32), and having the 'SKYLINE' part of it light up at night...

I went to a custom bodykit manufacturer, and he reckons I could use a belt sander to shave the letters off from the inside, because of the indentation on the letters. Alternatively, if that doesn't work, then I might have to sit down with a die grinder and do it all VERY carefully! If i slip up just once, it will ruin the whole thing  :)

Then I would need to put a perspex sheet behind it, and seal it so its watertight. Then just run a couple of globes from the rear lights to it, so it comes on with the lights. If I angle the lights right, it should light up the entire sheet of perspex, if you all know how perspex reacts to light  :P

Kind of hard to explain what I'm getting at, but if you use your imagination, I think it will be a worthwhile mod - would also give all of these used R32 rear bars a new lease on life!  :) Can put all sorts of colours through it, or even use a multi-coloured neon with colour selector in the cabin.

It's bound to set one 32 apart from another, and that's what it's all about, in an age dominated by BN kits and Vertex bars.  B)

I've got a few other crazy ideas on mucking around with 32s, if anyone cares to hear 'em...

Adrian.

Sounds good.

Post up some pics if u manage to get it done.....

you mean like this?

lit_up_arse.gif

welcome to 2002 :P

The part that lights up is a factory option that came on R32's from certain dealers in japan. It lights up slightly blue due to the EL sheet it uses. You can pull the EL sheet out (as it usually craps itself after a few years) and replace it with surface mount style LED's.

yeah my 33's got that. lights up a bluey green color..... like so.....

and yes the cops will harass you about it, coz they did with me and thats the reason why the wire is now disconnected so it doesnt light up anymore. ;)

post-14874-1129676911.jpg

yeh i have this on my 32 but it doesnt light up as its not connected wouldnt mind gettin it to show white light

i couldnt see anyway of f*kin around with the lighting tho, but in the day looks good as you can acutally read it

Edited by RB-Sam

Dammit! I thought I had thought up of something original! Oh well, I've got a few other crazy ideas for modding the 32 unlike anyone else's I've ever seen. Might have to keep them secret until I do it all... B)

Planning on pretty much doing a full-custom bodykit and interior, but I won't spoil the broth and spill the beans at the minute. You'll all just have to wait! :)

On what grounds did they harrass you about it for??  Sounds like a load of crap to me, i can't see anything that they could possibly pick on it for...

yeah I've never had any issues with mine, as when I'm driving normally it dosen't do the knight rider thing, it just acts like a regular brake repeater and all 7 characters light up. Pretty much like a high mount brake light.

On what grounds did they harrass you about it for??  Sounds like a load of crap to me, i can't see anything that they could possibly pick on it for...

Any light on the back of your car needs to be red, or it can be considered defective. The same goes for the sides which have to be orange and the front has to be white.

That said I have seen a cop defect a car for having Altezza style rear lights. The guy pleaded with the cop that there was nothing wrong with it. The cop said and I quote "I'm a police officer and I say its defective so its defective."

So really they can get you anyway they want. I guess its easier to get it cleared than take it to court, which means cops can defect just about anything thats not standard.

altezza lights are almost always illegal. thats why they say "for off road use only" when you buy them.

factory mazda 1's are obviosuly going to be fine

Ok. I was told different. Like I said I had always thought that as long as you had red on back etc. you were fine. Especially since Altezza lights do exactly the same thing as normal lights.

altezza lights are defective if they don't have red reflectors on them. Most ricer opt not to get reflectors as they're not JDM tyte enough with em on.

I guess my rear "SKYLINE" lights up red with the brakes, so that's why I don't get hassled about it.

yeah and mine lights up like a bluey green color like in the pic.

the reason was, coz its an "aftermarket lighting feature" pretty much using the same grounds to harrass you the same way as if you had underbody neons. thats the reason i got, and yes i think its a load of shit, and am thinking i should just hook it back up again and not care, coz i didnt get fined, just asked "nicely" to have it disconnected.

and dezz yeah i will say that if i get asked about it again when i hook it back up :(:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...