Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello ppls, i have just recently purchased my fist skyline (R33 Gtst)

As am not in the older part of my life (or hell even anywheres near the mid part thereof) i cannot afford insurance. So i am opting for a tracking system. What would be the best one to get????... I know they are generally about the $1500-$2000 mark + monitoring but i am happy to pay heaps more if it will get me a better system. (Considering the thousands im still not paying in insurance). I have been trying to search for "Tracker" themselves but with no luck. Does any1 have any suggestions???? Even better Contacts???

thanx -OFD14L

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/
Share on other sites

i know that Vision Security just released a new one to the market which actually seems to be quite good. There is a review on it in the 2002 Hot4s Yearbook... pg.124 rrp of $2200 including mapping software for your pc... My store sells it... i think it is good...not just becuase i sell it either.... i have used vision alarms for ages... good luck with it... let me know if you have any more q's :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138520
Share on other sites

I run quicktrack in both my cars, and my car hasn't been stolen yet.... who knows how effective it really is?

There are a few technologies, quicktrack is radio (thru buildings but limited coverage), satelite (line of sight only), gsm (mobile phone, maybe the best of both worlds).

My last car was stolen, and I'll do what I can to make sure this one doesn't got the same way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138537
Share on other sites

i've been told navtrak is better than quick. 3 satellites being used instead of 1. 3 pt immobiliser. i think 1200 to install plus first year coverage, then 300 every year after. Apparently no car with navtrak has been stolen, but i don't think it's been around long enough for anyone to give it a good try.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138658
Share on other sites

3rd party generally only covers up to the first $5000 of a car.. .basically its useless on any car of value. You have to go full comp if you want it insured up the full value. It stinks I reckon to pay "theft coverage" when they don't give you the full value if it is in fact stolen.

$2k seems a lot to install for a car that is maybe worth $20k.. maybe an R34 GTR it would be worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138689
Share on other sites

You want to have 3rd party at least. Some guy crashed into my crap r31 and had no insurance last year. RACV sued him for me and he had to morgage his house to pay to fix my car. Dumbass. Imagine if u hit a $100,000 car, ull b in shit. $500 for 3rd party doesnt look so bad after all.

Ive heard navtrak is good, better than quiktrak. Quiktrak works on radio signal so if ur not in the city its worth shit all. GPS works everywhere.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138739
Share on other sites

SS8_Gohan

Yeah, Quicktrack is radio, not GPS, so coverage is capital city only. They also claim "no thefts", but who knows exactly what that means? The main issue with GPS is you need line of site to 3 satelites to get a fix, which won't be effective any time you park under cover.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138791
Share on other sites

Nice one thanks ppls am going to look into both this week.

as for the third party property me thinks thats just common sense. I wouldnt drive a sigi on the road without third party property!!!. Just wont be able to get the full comp :) .

So happy with my baby... when i get a digi camera will post sum pics. I knw there are so many skylines out there but this ones mine me thinks thta makes it the best looking skyline!!! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138809
Share on other sites

Hi OFD14L,

I'm in the EXACT same position as you and will only be getting third party. Can you please check out both the Navtrak and QuickTrack option and decide which one is best? Ie, GPS coverage over radio coverage. Realiability, cost, and trackability like say under cover etc.

Your comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139015
Share on other sites

Originally posted by predator666

3rd party generally only covers up to the first $5000 of a car.. .basically its useless on any car of value.  You have to go full comp if you want it insured up the full value. It stinks I reckon to pay "theft coverage" when they don't give you the full value if it is in fact stolen.  

i think you got your facts mixed up....read ur 3rd party property policy again.

3rd party property covers any car or property that you damage. most insurance companies will cover up to 20 million dollars of damage.

Also most insurance companies will cover you (under 3rd party) if you were not at fault and the other person is uninsured up to the value of $3000.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139376
Share on other sites

hmm, u right when u say u must have 3rd party, its just common sense, but the thing is sometimes it aint much difference.

my mate wanted a 33 or 32, and th full comp for him with no rating was like 5-6k, but the 3rd party was still a few k aswell..it sucks but if u want these cars u gota pay it....

and 3rd party wont cover u for any reason....if someone smacks ya car up and cant pay ya pretty much screwed..insurance wont pay for u, thats why they have full comp....

and ya right about the max coverage, i think the max is 5k, so if ya car is stolen and worth 20k u get f***ed on, just gotta get full comp, its the only (kinda) safe way..

id be intereted to know about thos tracking systems too, i mean 2k is worth paying if it is in fact a mad system but if u gotta consider underground not workin etc its a total waste of money

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139452
Share on other sites

i think you got your facts mixed up....read ur 3rd party property policy again.

vishes you are correct...

and 3rd party wont cover u for any reason....if someone smacks ya car up and cant pay ya pretty much screwed..insurance wont pay for u, thats why they have full comp....

this is not 100% correct, it depends on the company and the circumstances I know that if someone smacks me and cant pay the insurance pays for me and sues them or something along these lines i forget but i was rather impressed...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139539
Share on other sites

3rd Party will cover property damage upto 10/20 million as a result of the driver's fault. The 5k or so limit is for theft, not property damage. Some 3rd party policies(like mine - suncorp) do not even cover theft.

On the issue of radio vs GPS, don't all tracking systems use radio waves? GPS uses radio waves too, just at a much higher frequency, which is why they do not go through buildings.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139628
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what's best, I took radio over GPS due to possible better recption underground. GSM (mobile) could be even better for reception though. Also remember radio only currently covers syd, melb, bris, can.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139763
Share on other sites

Jet-33, the upto 20 million property damage 3rd party will cover is for other people's properties you damage. 3rd party will not pay to fix up your car. Therefore, the maximum risk of getting 3rd party instead of comprehensive is the market value of your car in the case of a total write-off in an accident which you cause.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139973
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...