Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys we are looking at selling all of our equipment on the exhaust side of the engine.

1.full stainless manifolds

2.stainless dump pipes.

3.HKS GT-SS turbo's

4.Twin 3'' into 4'' front pipe.

5.complete custom intercooler piping to the intercooler.

6. will also pay to have the custom plumb back bov installed like we have.

The intercooler piping cost us $1500 alone.

This Kit has been proven to make 360AWKW!!

The car has only done about 12,000 kms with this set up all was purchased new.

The reason for selling is that we are looking into putting a very large single on the car.

We are going to sell the lot for $6200.

This combo would be one of the best street set-ups i've been in almost no lag and pulls to 8500rpm.

Cheers.

My dad ran an 11.7 with slow gear changes .he's 60.

with a good condition gear box,ours is pretty dead. it will run 10's no worries.

as for splitting it up we would only trade for a big single kit.

T51BB or T88 or T04Z full kits.

My dad ran an 11.7 with slow gear changes .he's 60.

with a good condition gear box,ours is pretty dead. it will run 10's no worries.

as for splitting it up we would only trade for a big single kit.

T51BB or T88 or T04Z full kits.

What terminal speed did it clock?

My dad ran an 11.7 with slow gear changes .he's 60.

with a good condition gear box,ours is pretty dead. it will run 10's no worries.

as for splitting it up we would only trade for a big single kit.

T51BB or T88 or T04Z full kits.

Well if you change your mind let me know as im interested in the turbos. You might have a hard time finding someone who has 6200 to spend all at once but the parts you list are all pretty quick and easy to find homes for individually.

The best part about the kit is the way the whole lot works together. there is almost no lag and its made 367at all four.

anyone who has been in the car will agree this would be one of the better all round GTR's with its amount of torque and power that it produces at such low boost. if i start selling everything separate that won't be getting the same power and response so they may be thinking they are getting dudded in the deal.

We are looking at putting on a T51 KAI BB if anyone knows how has they want to sell or swap.

Cheers

Well if you change your mind let me know as im interested in the turbos. You might have a hard time finding someone who has 6200 to spend all at once but the parts you list are all pretty quick and easy to find homes for individually.

Me too :)

depending what manifolds they are i'd be keen, dont need the turbo/dumps

Mine arrived the other week. Just dont have manifolds other than stockers i might get ext honed

The manifolds and dumps are from SUB-Zero in Queensland.

I don't really want to separate them so if one of you wants the turbos and the other wants the manifolds you might be able to work something out between yourselves.

I'll sell the whole lot together for $5500 and you can split the lot up if you want.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...