Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone here put their battery in their gtst in the boot of their car?

I was going to rewire the bosch 044 fuel pump for a direct feed from the battery, and i need the space in the engine bay for a remote mount filter, and catch tank.....so im gunna move it to the boot. :)

I know i have to run a + cable to the front...

Do i need to put the battery in one of them battery boxes?

Ive got a Delkor Calcium battery (660cca) Is that ok to use in the boot (dunno if it qualifies as a sealed battery or not)?

Any tips, or things i need to watch out for are appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93052-r32-gtst-battery-relocation/
Share on other sites

i did it in 180sx, ran thick cable to battery one of those sealed type from wrxhoon in gb section good battery, in a 20-30$ plastic box from supercheap

made another ground in the back and used some cable ties pretty straight forward just make sure cable not rubbing on any exposed metal anywhere use a bit of foam or grommets

yeah, just run a good wire to the front, otherside of the car to your amp wires (if your using any) as sometimes you get interference :P

otehr than that, thats what ill be doing.

Having it sit next to my surgie

not using an amp, or running a surge tank (but i dont know if i will one day :P)

Ive got some 10mm thick cable i can use for the + wire (its insulation is red too....bonus :P)

Dunno anywhere to earth it though, as my boot still has all the origional trim inplace....would any part of the car do, so long as its a good contact point?

Yes, good contact point is a must. Sand down the paint to the metal. I would mount the battery in a box on the passenger side of the boot. Run the wiring down the drivers side and then across in front of the petrol tank and to the left side of the boot. As noted above, make sure that it is not rubbing on any metal and/or sharp edges. If it has to go across a sharp edge, use some rubber sleeves (cut some rubber hose down the centre) and wrap it around the cable. Use cable ties to secure it in place.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...