Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what if a good number high HP ones are still using the stock item?

I'm with you there!!!

Gary (Sydneykid) had a great post awhile back stating that changing to aftermarlet plenums have in most cases no gains and in some cases negative gains.

post-4055-1131577237.jpg

i see little point in changing either. there's nothing wrong with the factory one. i still wonder why nismo re-invented the wheel with their aftermarket jobbie.

d

The standard one may be okay for power, but with the standard plenum, more air is distributed to the rear cylinders which means an unbalanced engine and leaner mixtures on the rear cylinders (if you tune with one O2 sensor).

Hence why RB26's tend to always do ring lands on number 6, rather than one of the front cylinders.

And the flow differences in injectors can be substantial, even after something like an hour of cleaning there was a variation of over 5% in the injector flow rates, which could result in a difference like 12:1 target but one cylinder running at 13:1

It's not a terribly easy thing to flowbench test as it's impossible to accurately reproduce the conditions inside the plenum as they would be with the engine running. Pulsing and reversion will make a difference to the way the air is distributed.

You can test the percentage differences between the head with a bellmouth and the head with a plenum attached for each cylinder and gain some results from that.

The best way to test would be with an exhaust temp gauge on each manifold runner just out of the exhaust port. If you know that all the injectors flow the same and the rear cylinder runs hotter than the rest then you know that that cylinder is getting more air than the others.

Most decent computers let you trim each injector to compensate which can bandaid the problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...