Jump to content
SAU Community

Skyline handling in wet

DJ_L3ThAL

By DJ_L3ThAL,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

poyz Proficient

poyz

Posted
Posted

Nar, I don't want one.

Ula has one and I spank his R32 running lest boost then my max setting in my shitbox.

I want a Mark 4 Chaser. But I can't justify letting go of the shitbox after I've spent quite a bit on stronger internals. Well, not until I buy a bigger turbo and shove 2.0bar down it's throat.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

poyz Proficient

poyz

Posted
Posted

Do you want to get into a discussion about who has more money?

I bought my R over two years ago. I'm quite certain that back then it cost more than your 92 (cost my car is a 92 GTi-R) Skyline.

Am I getting thru to you Skyline owners? I didn't want a Skyline, I never wanted a Skyline. Thats why I bought a GTi-R.

Sheez...it's like you GTS-t owners think you're all god because you drive a skyline. Get over it...it's a GTS-t...not a GTR. If I wanted a GTR I would have bought one. Or saved a bit more and bought one.

Originally posted by INASNT

pity they r a sh*it load cheaper than a skyline and u cant go out and buy a new 1 like u can with a skyline! :rolleyes:

poyz Proficient

poyz

Posted
Posted

Skylines without the flared rear guards look like crap too.

The GTS-t in standard form isn't deserving of it's inherited looks of the GTR.

Get over it. You're car isn't exactly a ZZ II Tommykiara. It's like seeing another dressed up Lancer made to be an Evo. You GTS-t owner do the same. I don't have fake GTR badges on my car. Nor do I pretend it's anything like one. But putting on a GTR front bar, grill, side skirt, wing, key.

Originally posted by predator666

they're ugly as crap too.. but yep, they go hard if you like the buzz box feel

JET-RB Rising Star

JET-RB

Posted
Posted

one other thing I brought my car 2.5 years ago and believe me back then they were not common the amount of stares I copped you'd think you were driving a Ferrari and it was standard with no body kit what so ever so you're wrong there...

and don't even go there comparing lines to commodores fool and don't bag us skyliners cause this ain't the place for that sort of behaviour you'd be on your own with your statements anyway, as people here are %99 skyline owners so why bother bro. I'm sure your car is very nice and I'm sure its quick too but who gives a shit!! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • Dose Pipe Sutututu
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By Dose Pipe Sutututu · Posted

      and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • soviet_merlin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • niZmO_Man
      Lock up the old for sale / wtb threads.

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • TurboTapin
      Ethanol Content Sensor - Always at 11%?

      By TurboTapin · Posted

      With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...