Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Rolled my car onto Bel Garage's dyno yesterday. I have attached torque and power curves.

The most we saw was about 990nm and 390rwkw, but my injectors were more than maxed at that level, so we took out a bit of boost.

awesome result, what setup u running? turbo/s, etc?

how come from 5100rpm its not making anymore power? (not having a dig, just a question)

Edited by StageZilla
awesome result, what setup u running? turbo/s, etc?

how come from 5100rpm its not making anymore power? (not having a dig, just a question)

I wish it made all of it's power by 5100RPM! The aim was not to make peak power anyway, but to get the most area under the curve.

I'm still running the useless laggy peaky GTRS turbos, but somehow, they don't seem so laggy now.

Oh...and the dip towards the top of the rev range is wheelspin on the rollers.

Edited by Mik

awesome result mate. 370+ kw at only 5100rpm is amazing :P

can i ask what type of cams you are running now? and injectors afms?

it must really hammer from about 4500 onwards.

nice! at what boost is it? 1.4? 1.5? these things are supposedly good for nearly 2bar. excellent for a stock stroke 26, would be pulling nice and hard by 4500. once you do your injectors, ive seen these hold power right up to 8grand!

what cams are you running?

beat me to it beer baron :P

Edited by SLY33
awesome result mate. 370+ kw at only 5100rpm is amazing :P

can i ask what type of cams you are running now? and injectors afms?

it must really hammer from about 4500 onwards.

Stock bro, even has a stock airbox .....

Nice results there Mik - Get some larger injectors in there STAT!

Why would traction be an issue? It's only got 370rwkw... :lol: Seriously though...traction is not too bad, but I do have pretty sticky 275s all round and it does like to randomly break traction in 2nd when it comes on boost.

Nick...to be honest, I though 700s would be okay. They are about as big as I would like to go on a daily driven car. I'm also running a bit more rail pressure than I would like.

Also something to note is that the torque figures estimated by these dynologs are apparently pretty accurate....just ask Morgs and WilliamsF1.

Awesome Mik, I'd definately upsize those injectors and pump a bit of boost into it. The new motor sounds like its a good one.

Edit: Mine only made 350kw at BEL which on CRD was 319Kw at all four, as a reference. Has since changed.

Edited by Morgs

I don't really care about the numbers to tell you the truth (although the torque one is interesting).

So your car only made 319 at CRD? That's so odd...after what you made at SMW, and speaking to Jason, I would have expected heaps more than that.

Also, Tommy's car made 330ish at CRD irc and a bit under 300 on Bel's dyno in the same state of tune.

I'm more worried about the shape of the curve and how it drives, which is why we spend a couple of hours on the freeway cleaning up the spool-up.

I'll go to the drags eventually, it will be a while though because I'm flat out with work atm.

yes, but what cams and afms? :D

:)

yes the curve does look very good. and like you said the dyno graph is really only relevant to you. It's just lets you know how much improvment you have been making.

Is that the same dyno Jerry made 240rwkw on with his car?

Nice result - doing anything else to it or are you finished? Whens it go to the drag strip? :D

No Andrew , i expect my car to make about 260-270 rwkw on that dyno, but my car is pretty gutless , just about everyone makes more power than me !

I will let you know what power mine makes on this dyno when she goes on it soon .

(yes, but what cams and afms?)

Beer Baron : refer to post 7 . There is plenty wrong with airboxes when you make that kind of power, but he wants a stock car .

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...