Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive removed the old RB20 out of my S14 and bought a NEO 25t instead. I also have a MasterPower T3/T4. I was originally going to use an XSPOWER top mount manifold, but because of my problems which ive outlined in this thread (http://d1nz.org.nz/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9146), im begining to look at the standard manifold as an option. It will: -

A- cost alot less as i dont have to modify my intercooler piping

B- allow me to keep the standard planum as is.

I fitted the turbo on the standard manifold but it sits very, very low. Here are some pics -

DSC01670.jpg

DSC01650.jpg

DSC01631.jpg

As you can see, the comp out let sits right next the engine mount.

DSC01662.jpg

DSC01661.jpg

This is how things are in the S14 engine bay. This turbo will not fit will it? Anyone else have a big turbo mounted on the standard manifold? Will my setup work out?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97298-low-mount-t3t4-possible/
Share on other sites

Hey mate all you need to do is turn the compressor cover so the outlet faces up, if it hits the manifold get a small spacer made up and longer studs for the manifold.Thats what i did for my 32 and it all fit in fine.

Thanks mate, I will do that. Help with oil lines for the turbo would also be appreciated. Ive never done this before. Can the standard oil lines be used with the new turbo, or will i need custom ones? If so, where do I get them from?

Looking at the turbo, there doesnt seem to be an inlet for the oil lines that are on the engine block? These are the only inlets on the turbo -

DSC01675.jpg

DSC01674.jpg

Are these oil or water inlets? There is nothing on the block that resemble these?

Sorry for sounding so clueless, but its the first time a fiddle around with a turbo install. :)

they are oil inlets.

Every turbo needs oil. Not all run water however.

My old t04 never used the water lines.

If the stocker ones you cant get to fit, just but some new ones. The return one you should be able to re-use/modify to fit

For the feedline, just get teflon one made up (under $100) with the proper fittings (take it to a hose shop and they'll know what u need if you take the old ones/turbo down there)

buddy of mine had that same turbo mounted to the stock exhaust manifold on his rb20 which was in a s14 as well, like stated above all that needs to be done is clocking the compressor housing and you will be mint.

on my personal car ive got an rb20 with the hks cast manifold along with the r32 xmember for mounting and even on a lhd car i have had no problems with clearances........you should be good assuming the engine mounts are good.

DSC01685.jpg

Thats better!

Now that the turbo fitment is sorted, I need to figure out the oil feed issue. I was mistaken by saying there is nothing on the block that resembles the inlets on the MasterPower turbo. If you look at the picture below you can see the hose has an inlet identical to 1 on the turbo.

DSC01675.jpg

DSC01687.jpg

Now, this inlet goes back INTO the block, which i assume then makes it the 'return line' as you said R31Nismoid (am I correct?). There however is no inlet from the block to go into the top side of the turbo...

This one-

DSC01674.jpg

So what do I do here? And what about the metal lines that you can see (all bent up) in the 1st pic? Shall i just remove them and fit the holes with a screw?

Your time and help is very appreciated guys :)

Thats better!

Now that the turbo fitment is sorted, I need to figure out the oil feed issue. I was mistaken by saying there is nothing on the block that resembles the inlets on the MasterPower turbo. If you look at the picture below you can see the hose has an inlet identical to 1 on the turbo.

Now, this inlet goes back INTO the block, which i assume then makes it the 'return line' as you said R31Nismoid (am I correct?). There however is no inlet from the block to go into the top side of the turbo...

So what do I do here? And what about the metal lines that you can see (all bent up) in the 1st pic? Shall i just remove them and fit the holes with a screw?

Yes the large hole is the drain that goes back into the block under gravity through the large hose down low into the sump.

The metal pipe from the back oif the motor is the water cooling feed to the orig turbo, remove it back around where its in the rubber hose and block the rubber hose where it used to fit into.

AND forget everything i just wrote below! Damn I did not look closely at first - you neeed another flanged fitting at the top replacing the spiraled pipe into the block!

The other metal spiraled pipe is the oil under pressure top feed into the turbo bearing housing. Take that pipe of and make sure that it is completely clean inside and liquid can run through it - they can get blocked or gummed up - then look at the entry hole from the pipe tube into the centre banjo opening and enlarge it at each end if need be - one end may be reduced in size significantly - better to be opened up especially if not a ball bearing turbo. Make sure you use a new copper washer on the top and bottom of the banjo housing to make sure the bolt seals the banjo correctly. You DONT need oil weeping from here when the turbo is under pressure for obvious reasons.

Im a little confused here. So the return feed is sorted.

Your saying the metal pipe that comes from behind the block is the water line which is not used with the new turbo. I will remove it and block it off, so sorted.

Now im left with TWO metal pipe oil feeds on the block (as you can see on the photo on the top) and an inlet feed on the turbo with a flange that doesnt resemble the two metal pipes on the block.

What your saying that I somehow need to make up a custom flange that bolts into the inlet feed flange on the turbo and connect it to the metal oil line pipes from the block? If so, which one? Block one off and use one or somehow merge both oil feed lines into the turbo oil inlet flange?

Am I on the right track here or totally muddled up?!

"Your saying the metal pipe that comes from behind the block is the water line which is not used with the new turbo. I will remove it and block it off, so sorted."

I would just cut the fittings off each end thats not attached to the block and join the two metal pipes together with a rubber hose clamped at each end that way the coolant will still flow through it as it would with the stock setup.

Bypassing any problems u might have if the coolant is also used to cool another section of the engine on its merry way

The metal pipe at the back of the block is a water feed. Get a treaded bung from a hydraulic fittings joint (take your old banjo bolt in as a template for the thread and size) and block it off at the block.

The other water line runs from the back of the head. Remove the rubber hose at the inlet manifold and get a rubber bung and a hose clamp and block it off.

The oil feed is the metal hose with the spiral in it. You will need a custom one to fit your turbo most likely. You will also need an adapter that will bolt to the top of your turbo and has a treaded section in it to accept either a screw in fitting or a banjo bolt. See link below.

http://www.gcg.com.au/Catalogue_Menus/Turb...d_-6fitting.htm

Your oil return can likely be reused as it looks like you have a t3 based core same as the stocker.

One question. Where's the wastegate supposed to go as it looks like you have a non wastegated exhaust housing.

For everyone who wants to run a line between the water line fittings when you go to a non water cooled turbo, think how it's done on a NA rb. I can tell you now there isn't a random line running around the back of the head.

Ive got a 38mm WG sitting next to me. Gonna weld it on the standard manifold.

I know what i need to do now, thanks to you guys, but one more question still lingers. Ive got the waterline sorted. But there are two metal oil lines on the side of the block. Do they BOTH need to meet together and run into the turbo, or shall i block one and use the other?

EDIT- I just re-read your post BHDave. So your saying there are two waterlines and one oil line? Im a little baffled, as they both emerge from the same area on the block, where there should obviously only be oil, not water? Mind circling my pic and pointing which is the oil line?

Edited by DRFT 14

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...