Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

considering there was a thread about this last week...

for 300rwkw, you may aswell get used to the idea you'll be shifting manually.

For one the stock box wont take anywhere near that kinda punishment.

A Jatco with around 1k-1.5k spent on it is what you'll be after.

And then its going to be full manual shiftment

I have allready had a shift kit installed, and working on a high stall to get rid of some of the turbo lag. At the end of the day i brought the car for my wife to drive to the shops, as she loves the grunt that the skyline puts out , yet she would rather concentrate on the road then flat changing second when some tosser in a commodore gives her a smile at the lights.. hence i got the auto...

Whats this Jatco box your on about? do you know where i can get one from if my box bites it. also any ideas on suitability of different high stalls, and revs?

The turb dosent start cooking til near on 5000, but a 5000 stall would be a little impractical for shopping.. any suggestions... Cheers

turbo at 5000rpm? what on earth have you got fitted to it?

the stock turbocharger comes on at 2800rpm.

if oyu do the basic stage 1 mods it sohuld be a quick street car whilst retaining the stock ecu still.

cold air intake

boost controller

remapped or apexi safc

3" turbo back exhaust with split dump

front mount intercooler

should get you near 180rwkw and be plently quick enough with a good shift kit and maybe reco'd auto box and bigger transcooler if your worried about reliability. the jatco box is from the vl turbo rb30et and its a very tough box if reco'd and setup properly, have a look on calais turbo for some jatco workshops who can quote / give you some advice. if you wanna stay under 200rwkw then the stock box is probably fine. just service it and get a bigger transcooler.

There was a car in last months issue of HPI if I remember correctly that used bikkirom, can't quite remember all the details though. Will have to look it up again, I think they were using it in a Ceffy?

"My cat's name is Mittens."

turbo at 5000rpm? what on earth have you got fitted to it?

the stock turbocharger comes on at 2800rpm.

if oyu do the basic stage 1 mods it sohuld be a quick street car whilst retaining the stock ecu still.

cold air intake

boost controller

remapped or apexi safc

3" turbo back exhaust with split dump

front mount intercooler

should get you near 180rwkw and be plently quick enough with a good shift kit and maybe reco'd auto box and bigger transcooler if your worried about reliability. the jatco box is from the vl turbo rb30et and its a very tough box if reco'd and setup properly, have a look on calais turbo for some jatco workshops who can quote / give you some advice. if you wanna stay under 200rwkw then the stock box is probably fine. just service it and get a bigger transcooler.

i have already done most of the bolt on mods, including gt30, pump, reg, fmic, cold air, electric boost controler, stainless low mount manifold,3inch dump straight thru to rear tip. and soon to order injectors and ecu...

I fitted the first ever Wolf plugin (was the proto type) to an R33 GTS auto around 2001 and this car still has had no trans problem.

The car is around 300rwhp and was a daily driver city car but for the last 2 years has been in the bush driving from margaret river to busselton evrey working day.

For the WA ppl this was Grant from PER4MANZ Turbos car and now belongs to Jamie wholagan and many would know he spares no car.

Nissan autos are Jatco but the toughest Jatco to start building with is the VL commodore turbo box and it needs no input from the ECU.

yeah, wasnt totally clear :D

the VL isnt the elec box like the R33/R32/R31 (series3) boxes are.

the elec boxes are total crud to rebuild

as for 300rwkw from an auto/GT30.

I dont think thats realistic. 280rwkw at the most.

The auto sucks a bit more of the power as opposed to the manual

but 5000rpm - no way a gt30 in any spec would be that late. even with a 1.06 housing

i was in the same position for finding a ECU for my auto r33

i was gettin mixed opinions of if it worked or didn't

as to saying that it "worked" meaning the car moved

apperantly gear changes are bit harsh and gearbox wont last too long

and chasing 300rwkw gearbox won't last that long either.

I changed the gearbox to manual, drive in drive out for 2500

didn't really want to do that, but hey, i knew gettin a aftermarket ECU was definately going to work.

and didn't have to muck around with rebuilding box, getting a shift kit, a stall converter, or finding a ecu that might work or not.

I'm modding my car close to 250rwkw, and know the manual will be right, might have to get a new clutch, but thats about it.

Also with the advantage of knowing what gear you are in, being able to power through corners, without the concern of changing down a gear on ya. ( Nearly lost it once going around a corner and changed a gear on me , ass end got a bit happy, bit exciting)

Also i want to get into the drifiting side of things, the auto would of been a bit weird.

But yeah if ya want a spare autobox, i have one.

THanks

Barret

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...