Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Those are interesting results that you have there.

My car made 164.9rwkw on Mercury's Dyno with the following mods only:

*3" Dump from turbo, into stock pipe 2 inches??? This is what I was told by the guys from the shop?

*Standard Cat

*3" Mandrel the rest of the way and a 4" Canon.

And on the intake side, a Apexi Power intake pod (not enclosed, naughty me)

And the guys said my car would benifit greatly from the type of dump you are talking about and a highflow cat, now it looks like that is what I'll be doing next.

Importantly however, comparing my dyno sheet to yours, it seems yours has a bit more 'meat' throughout the whole range before reaching the peak power.

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

BTW, i can post up my Dyno sheet for anyone who would like to compare my results to the above results.

I don't know how much use it would be, quantifying different results on different cars, but it may be of interest to someone.

Hey guys, most of you have the right idea about the split dump, most importantly, the drop in kw on the dyno was only between 6500 - 7000 RPM this was due to the stock cams. i have since reset my ECU and it feels even better on top end.

BHDave: its a full 3" system with high-flow CAT... read the original post for full details...

If anyone is intrested in this setup... for R32, R33 and R34 contact Jimmy at Liverpool exhausts.... tell him Sarkis sent you.. and for the Dyno and ECU tuning contact Adam at Just Engine Managment.. These guys are the best of the best and look after their customers!

www.justenginemanagement.com

www.liverpoolexhaust.com.au

There both located in moorebank NSW

Regards,

Sarkis

Edited by QRI05E

QRI05E - great results, what did it end up costing you if you don't mind - can you break it down..

also - you will notice with the freer flow of air boost is up ~0.5-0.8psi to redline from approx 5,000 to redline.. This would also help I would imagine..

Am definately interested in getting something like this done on mine and with the turbotech bleedvalve should make a decent difference..

Would probably reset the ECU straight away and let it relearn..

Edited by Links

So you gained 10 from the exhaust and another 10 from the revised dump. Sounds more reasonable, though there is still some conjecture about the performance of the short split dump at higher power (as in the bolt on replacement dump) vs the one piece as shown by mafia.

Thats the main thing i'm asking as the drop off as shown on the graph could well be a sign of the top end choke commonly associated with these type of dumps and may well be more pronounced when you start making more power.

Edited by BHDave

We then took it back to the work shop and fitted a single 3" dump, CATCO 702cfm CAT, 3" mandrel bend exhaust with 6" cannon...

From what I gather.. 3" split dump, 3" front, 702cfm CAT, 3" exhaust..

leads me to the same conclusion - you are saying you have a full 3" exhaust and highflow cat.

Edited by Links

Yes... both Dump pipes were tested with full 3" exhaust and highflow CAT... however the first dyno run was completely stock except for the 3" front pipe that came with the car from japan so most likely if i had a 2" front pipe too it would of been around the 140rw/kw stock therefore approx 24rw/kw increase from the split n full 3" setup. But due to the 3" front pipe the car made 144rw/kw stock..

Just a note: My split dump pipe and front pipe are one piece same as the pictures posted...

In regards to the price, every car will vary depending if you want HPC coating, mildsteel/stainless, type of CAT, type of muffler/cannon.. If you contact Jimmy at Liverpool Exhaust and tell him Sarkis sent you, he will package an exhaust set up and will look after you price wise...

Regards,

Sarkis

Evan R33,

The CES dump pipe illustrates exactly what I was getting at.

They have chose to join the wastegate in on a straight section of the exhaust, not a bend and especially not the outer of a bend.

Exhaust gas has intertia just as everything else does, once its moving in a direction it doesn't like changing.

By placing the merge on the outer of a bend your creating turbulence as the exhaust gas hits it and tries to turn a bend.

Thats the way I visualise it with ZERO knowledge of flow dynamics, could some one possibly clear this up that does have knowledge of flow dynamics???

Hey Arkon, The only thing that might need modifying would be the flange on the split dump.. i have seen an R33 in the workshop with a Garret T04 high-flow running 25psi with the same split dump i used and the flange was modified to fit the turbo housing... and it worked a treat on the dyno... The only time the dump pipe will have to be remade is you put a high mount manifold.... otherwise if the standard manifold is used, the same dump can be used... hope that answered your question...

Regards,

Sarkis

Edited by QRI05E
So you gained 10 from the exhaust and another 10 from the revised dump. Sounds more reasonable, though there is still some conjecture about the performance of the short split dump at higher power (as in the bolt on replacement dump) vs the one piece as shown by mafia.

Thats the main thing i'm asking as the drop off as shown on the graph could well be a sign of the top end choke commonly associated with these type of dumps and may well be more pronounced when you start making more power.

I have absolutely no doubt at all that a bolt on split dump will perform better than the stock item. If any of you have a look at the stock item, it is basically flat and perpendicular to the wastegate opening. The link posted below has pictures. This would cause the wastegate gases to merge with the exhaust gases at 90 degrees. Definitely very restrictive.

If you look at the stock frontpipe, it's actually a reasonably designed pipe. Up to the limits of the stock turbo, changing the dump alone (without changing front pipe) should eliminate restrictions.

Best bargain upgrade would be to just change the dump to a split item, which is cheap e.g. for sale atm:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...topic=97734&hl=

compared to the price of a full split front/dump for 450 from batmbl.

Is that in comparison to the other dump that is for sale in the link above?

Or you mean in comparison to the entire dump/engine pipe combo?

I was referring to the link in particular not the entire combo pipe that batmbl sells.

Edited by RB30-POWER

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...