Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You must be careful with the ones from E-bay.

They WILL NOT fit a Series II R33 or an R34 GTT.

WILL NOT FIT. The dum pipe length is different on these models.

Also, the BOS Importing BATMBL ones are AWESOME. You should buy one of those. I'm as happy a Larry with mine and the quality is tops.

BASS OUT

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The ebay link and the Manwhore link.

They are the same dump. 2.5"

The batmbl dumps are good, basically the same as the ces.

But still for $130 thats stuff all.

I definitely agree that the batmbl dumps are pretty good. They are however very expensive @450.

like you said, 130 is stuff all for a split dump. I don't really see the fact that it's 2.5 " as being a problem up to the limits of the stock turbo.

There was a group buy on here a while ago for the C.E.S. item, picked mine up from that, only cost me around $650 I THINK, that was with special coating same as the pic posted earlier.

If there is enough interest you should look into doing another.

  • 1 month later...

Interesting read....

Just bought my SII-R33 and it has a 4" exhaust from the CAT-back. I want to get the 3" piping from the turbo to the CAT.

I was just wondering if it is worth spending $1000-$3000 the get an 3" full system for the 10-20rwkw gain?

Looking at the graph I notice that the power gain is like 10kw from ~3750rpm - ~4750rpm and 20rwkw from 5500rpm to redline. Do you guys really take your skyline to ~6000rpm in every gear to get the power gain, cause I don't think I'll be driving like this every weekend.

My friend told me that my 4" CAT-back is not necessary as my engine is stock and that the 4" does not have good back-pressure. Can anyone shed some light on this. Thanks.

Keep the 4inch cat back. Your mate has no idea what he's talking about. On a turbo engine (actually any engine) you want the least back pressure possible from a performance point of view. Even in a NA engine the scavenging effect is due to the runner length of the headers and collector design, not the backpressure in the exhaust.

The only reason the get rid of your current cat back is if it is too loud/drony for you to take in day to day driving.

Anyway, you don't need to spend 1-3k as you already have the exhaust. A one piece front/dump pipe and a decent cat (say 3 inch minimum) is all you need to get/replace. Thats well under a grand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...