2rismo

What was it that gave it away? The big JEM stickers on the dyno or the big ones on the control unit in all the photos and video from the event? (Apologies if you didn't attend the event - it just read like you had been super-sleuthing.) LOL!

FLASHBACKLOLLING!!!!

I did some quick maths on the RH9 GTR versus the GAS Supra and hp/ci (efficiency) the GTR wins hands down.

His car runs.

You're not great at this are you, champ. And you reckon I get stressed? Chill out already

Case in point; If you were a moderator of this forum, what would your actions be in relation to the quoted text above?

Simon, the problem arises from laziness, poor grammar, internet slang, (call it what you like) not being clear about perspective, time frame, ownership or tense. If people aren't clear in what they're saying, that is, if there is any ambiguity in the nature or basis of their post, and a mod decides action needs be taken, then it will and it should happen.

Good luck bruz! And when you find out, can you please tell me? I lost mine ages ago. Cable ties FTW!

We can all read the "Defence of innocent dissemination" rules or check out Oznetlaw.net whenever we feel like it. The point of the matter in relation to your post is; I felt that it was defamatory so we (SAU) can't really show that we didn't know something was defamatory if we thought it was. Let's keep going, shall we? ISP's may argue that but I don't think it's unreasonable with the admin/moderator structure we operate. You of all people understand that we (the mod/admin team) are not solicitors and as such, we take the appropriate preventative measures to avoid anyone (business or individual) from being defamed. Sure, some slip through the cracks but that doesn't mean we're happy about it or that it's right. Also, whether certain comments are defamatory or not (by a legal determination), we can and will do whatever we like with users' posts - especially if we think someone is being defamed. I will point out that while this forum is publicly accessible, access is a privilege and not a right. See the rules for this forum that have already been posted if you need further clarification. In essence, it's not your forum but you've agreed to abide by the rules when you joined so you should do just that. Admin/Moderator discresion is exercised regularly and does not require justification of any type, other than that to other admins/mods when and if asked.

Oh snap!

Get into it, mate!!

I reckon I've got a rubber one from a gasket set you can have for stuff all dollars. Certainly not $105. lol

Nothing like the 55 on the 2J

And we point the constabulary in your direction when our new policy doesn't fall into line with federal law, do we?

Awesome!

If only you knew. Assumption is the mother of all phuckups.

Wait, just re-read the first post. The engine is in bits or about to be, right? Just have a look at the front of the intake cam. Does it have one big bolt or four little ones?

Just had a quick look and finding specs on Apexi cams is bloody hard/impossible. Can't be more help than the above. Sorry.

Jase, you have no idea what you missed. (searches for tailpipe ownage photos)

Not necessarily. If you buy an off-the-shelf pair of Tomei Poncams cams to suit an RB25DET, the intake cam will NOT have the facility for an adjustable cam gear and will only use one large bolt to retain the factory gear. An RB20DET intake cam with the same specs will fix this issue though. Not sure about the Apexi cams but they're still hydraulic so there's a chance it wont be as simple as throwing a new gear on.

before your time, Junior.

That thing is flat-out tough! Best of luck getting it back.

Edited and yes, that's how I understand it, mate. But Mark is in the thread so I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.

I don't believe so, no.

I'd agree with you under normal circumstances but in this case (and even though after checking, it's "it" and not "they"), the statement was being made in reply to; "If I were you I would seriously have a chat with Noel (fineline) about those clutches before you think of getting one. Major issues " "any elaborations?" "it explodes..." Clearly the comment is in relation to "those clutches" with the previous making a warning "before you think of getting one". The first poster in this sequence also suggests that "those clutches" have "Major issues". This is not a specific statement as read and instead goes to support the claim that generally, these clutches have major issues. You can argue this point all day if you like but it wont be with me. Like I said, if you ever fell that any of the staff of SAU have acted improperly, you know what to do.