Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The auto is fine for the drags, but if your planning on giving it a heap of power then the manual is much better. You can think about putting in a stall-converter to help with launches, but the manual is much more fun to drive.

See'ya:burnout:

The auto is good. It is very weak tho'.

The thing will need a strong rebuild, a shift kit of some kind, a larger trans cooler perhaps and a hi-stall built.

Alternatively a trimatic like the VL turbo's run would be a much better bet for serious power. The performance rebuild of a trimatic or turbo350 is very cheap, even after the custom install its going to work out cheaper for a tough as nails trans.

The dude TRY9, i think it was him, had a trimatic fitted to his RB and was doing 10's with it from memory.

Auto i guess easier just for dump and go... no brainer generally.

If you do up your engine and you end up blowing an auto box you're going to require a whole new one or a rebuild (expensive). I was quoted once $1800 for a new auto fitted, and that was for an old R31 (guess same as VL box?). Hate to think how much for R33.

In a manual most of the time you just blow the clutch (much cheaper!), replace for a bigger one and keep driving.

I took an auto for a drive when i was looking around. wasn't very happy at all. It didn't pull all that hard. it was in good condition overall tho'.

With manuals you can stretch the gears out more too.

But yeah autos are way cool for drags spesh for consistent times.

HI Stall big turbo combinations work really well, say your turbo doesn't make boost until 3300rpm, by getting a 3500rpm HI Stall as soon as you put the foot down your at 3500rpm instantly and at boost. There is a down side to it though, wheel spin is quite vicious and fuel economy is down while cruising as the convertor is basically slipping until 3500rpm.

Every Auto has a stall converter but there usually set very low like 1500rpm, a HI stall convertor just replaces the stock one, and no it can't be switched off coz it's sort of like a clutch that won't fully engage until the set rpm.

The car won't always be at 3500rpm(eg) but at the slightest press of the accelerator the rpm's will jump up to 3500, that's why the fuel economy is effected.

An Auto is the way to go

Think about the developments in motor sports today, all of the big ($$) teams are using auto boxes with manual selection through paddles/buttons on the wheel. Whilst I would agree that a stock R33 auto isnt a quick shifting beast, with a little work it has great potential.

The idea that you can hold gears longer in a manual is crap. I can select a gear and keep it there until the Porer FC's rev limiter cuts in (not a nice feeling), but more importantly you can set the auto to shift at the correct rev point. (no more going over the top of your power curve, and costing you time) every time without you having to watch the tacho (which moves too bloody fast anyway :-P )

As mentioned above boost comes on when needed via the correct torque converter.

The other advantage is that the throtle is held open for the length of the run (no need for the blow off valve to work) and hence no spool down on the turbo. (ie boost from foot down to foot off)

As to the idea or poor durability my R33 puts out 180 RWKW and has given no problems. (stock auto) My new auto (sharper shifts, higher stall converter) was in a car that was constantly given stick and put out over 230 RWKW.

My advice is dont listen to those who have not played with auto equiped skylines. (they probably dont eat quiche just because they were told once that REAL MEN dont eat it)

  • 10 months later...

I must say I went from a vl auto to r33 manual and manual kicks ass. So much more involved, used to get bored when driving an auto. The manual is so much more active and involved, like a real race car

I think manual is great for dragging too, everyone loves the chips in 2nd and 3rd when u do a quick shift :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...