Jump to content
SAU Community

  

46 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

If you're keeping the car stock, go the Supra.

The NA Supra is always underestimated.

you mean keeping the car stock engine wise or cosmetics wise.

it depends if i get a non-turbo then mostly cosmetics and probably exhaust. but if i get a turbo then money will be spent on both looks and performance.

hey IOWNU: i don wanna go off topic but in your signature you say you have a GTO, is that the grey one (i think) that i've seen on pascoe vale road.

Nope mine is blue with bronze rims.

Speaking of which, my cousin is selling his GTO at the moment, its also blue, but its non turbo and auto. Here's the link.......just in case you're interested. It would cost you the same as those other cars, he wants to get rid of it so might be negotiable.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=101828

Sorry about the shameless plug :D

Nope mine is blue with bronze rims.

Speaking of which, my cousin is selling his GTO at the moment, its also blue, but its non turbo and auto. Here's the link.......just in case you're interested. It would cost you the same as those other cars, he wants to get rid of it so might be negotiable.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=101828

Sorry about the shameless plug  :D

oh my god if only my brother had seen it a week ago before he bought a car. it's very tempting but auto's just don't do it for me. thanks anyway mate.

you sure you haven't been on pascoe vale road it's the only GTO that i've ever seen on the road.

you mean keeping the car stock engine wise or cosmetics wise.

Engine wise

A stock Supra NA would have no problems keeping up with (or even beating) a stock R32 GTS-T.

i picked NA supra simply because they are one of the best looking, less common, majorly respected cars around and an NA model is great for putting around.

guy around the corner has one, short shifts it like a hoe and it sounds sooo godly with his exhaust.

oh my god if only my brother had seen it a week ago before he bought a car. it's very tempting but auto's just don't do it for me. thanks anyway mate.

you sure you haven't been on pascoe vale road it's the only GTO that i've ever seen on the road.

I'm on Pascoe Vale Rd a fair bit.

But mines Blue not Silver lol!

My mate also has an n/a Supra. Very nice to drive and quite powerful for what it is but like most small (non-v8) na engines, you need to get the revs up to really feel the power. This was in my experience driving it.

I voted Gts-t though. RB20Det = more potential than 2JZ-GE (not counting a turbo conversion on the 2J)

this thread reminds me of nissansilvia. Grow a pair of balls, go to a dealership test drive, sit in and figure out what YOU like. Who gives a rats flying arse what a bunch of retards on a forum think you should do. At the end of the day, its a car YOU need to feel comfortable with, one that YOU can afford to keep on YOUR budget, and one that YOU'RE stuck with till you decide to sell it. Not them.

In any case I voted for teh R32 GTSt... :D RB20 powah!

Go the R32, beautiful car got everything you need and later down the track when you want more power your payin big bucks to do a turbo conversion. you'll already have one. Ive beatin na supra's i just stay away from the turbod brothers lol and besides the price of a na supra is well over the price of a GTS-t. dont not think about a 4 door either, not many out there so your different straight away and dont have to get out all the time to let the girlies in. lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...