Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went to APC the other day and i saw a RB25DE plenum which looked very similar to the greddy item. It apparently uses the standard injectors and a Q45 throttle body but is a cheap casting job.

Has anyone actually had one of these fitted with good results?

I ask because i have a crappy cut and shut with a front feeding (like GTR) inlet and i would like to replace it with this one if it is any good. I believe they said it costs around $700ish.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103450-rb25-intake-plenum/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I checked out ISL-33P  and his profile says a custom plenum (exchange) costs $1000 where the one i am talking about costs $700ish (from memory).

Where is APC, i would love to see some pics of the cast one.

Also paulr33, i need a front facing plenum like the greddy one for a 25/30 engine conversion so i dont have to lower the motor to far and can keep my strut bar.

i have a 25/30 and for 1300 ariel (ISL33P) created a custom plenum that flows a shitloads more than most top jap brands (has flow tests to prove and also comes with 80mm throttle body and bolts to stock runners and fuel rail

ben...

ill get pics of the inside tomorrow to try and show how its pretty much full smooth theres no weld marks inside, no rough surface at all, and has been bench flow tested with less than 2% change within all 6 cylinders which i have recently seen a greddy one bench flow tested and it aint even close to that

ben...

  • 2 weeks later...

Plazmaman Plenums are the best i have seen when looking to purchase a plenum. it works great and looks really good. They make em in some awesome 80tonne press.

go to www.gtr.com.au and have a look there (UAS) $1150

They are easy to install and use the stock throttle body (or you get another flange for any other type) and they use the standard gasket and runners.

Makes me engine bay look sweet and with the RB30DET i can fit my strut brace =)

skyplazplenum.jpg

skyplazplenum2.jpg

They have been flow tested and proven to make power as well.

DYNO SHEET BELOW SHOWS RESULTS OF THIS PLAZMAMAN PLENUM & INTERCOOLER KIT FITTED TO A SKYLINE R33 GTS-T WITH STANDARD TURBO, STANDARD ECU (WITH FUEL CUT DEFENDER), STANDARD ENGINE INTERNALS, ADJUSTABLE EXHAUST CAM GEAR, RAM POD AND FULL 3" EXHAUST SYSTEM.

plazmadu.gif

Edited by Guilt-Toy

This is what the one from APC looks like.

The difference is that this looks like it is meant to be there and it is apparently identical to the GREDDY manifold but takes the standard injectors (not standard throttle body).

post-2060-1139455220.jpg

Edited by R33NT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...