Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was just wondering if there is anyway you can tell what model GTR or what year the an RB26DETT was built by looking at the engine alone?

is there anything in the engine number? or small differences btw R32, R33 & R34's?

also, if i put an RB26 in a 33gts-t, will there be any clutch change needed? I have a Jim Berry brass clutch in there right now (behind my RB25). will that bolt up the a RB26?

thanks for any help. Just looking into the possibility at the moment.

Berin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103728-rb26-identification/
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can Anyone answer the above questions, especially the one about the model identification?

I know this thread is a year old, but it has the questions i need answered.

I have an Engine Number: RB26 062621A. I am considering purchasing this engine, can someone tell me what model GTR it came out of ?

Can Anyone answer the above questions, especially the one about the model identification?

I know this thread is a year old, but it has the questions i need answered.

I have an Engine Number: RB26 062621A. I am considering purchasing this engine, can someone tell me what model GTR it came out of ?

Maybe FAST will do this for you Al. Try posting it in the FAST thread. if i had a copy id see if i could run it for ya.

might catch ya tomorrow at the GM. Ron

Can Anyone answer the above questions, especially the one about the model identification?

I know this thread is a year old, but it has the questions i need answered.

I have an Engine Number: RB26 062621A. I am considering purchasing this engine, can someone tell me what model GTR it came out of ?

There are small differences but they can all be changed to look like a later model engine. R34 engines have different CAS, harder to make a 32+33 engine look like a 34 .

The only way to tell for sure is the engine number . The one you have there is a late 33 GTR engine, series III.

  • 4 months later...

from another thread that wrxhoon replied too in regards to engine numbers

no i dont have a 94 gtr ,

we have a 95 ( may ) engine number 55xxx and a 97 ( feb ) eng number 63xxx and i know someone else has r33 95 ( march)51xxx and i know 45000 is a late r32 engine (94 ) but cant help you with a month .

  • 4 years later...
  • 4 weeks later...

http://webbersrbguide.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=47:engine-number-register&catid=42:engine-number-registers&Itemid=2

can see it here but may be later model if you follow the number pattens.

Where on the block is the engine number stamped guys?

trying to identify mine as well....

  • 7 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...