Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I cant see Webber going to Ferrari. The only rumours have been talk amongst ppl on forums etc. There hasnt been any public comments from ppl that have any say. If he leaves Williams you would have to bet he is goignt o Renault or BMW before Ferrari.

In fact i would rather see Webber stay put

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

and FRINK like i said Schumi only represents 2% of the Ferrari F1 story-if he ends up at Renault next year Ill be more than happy to see him into the wall :laugh:

i understand what your saying, but i think the chapter in the history books of ferrari which include MS would be one of the best chapters in ferrari's history, cause of what and who he brought to the team and in bringing them back to winning form. even if MS does move at the end of the year, (which i dont think he will...), you'd have to have a 'soft spot' for him?

webber stated right at the start of his career that his dream would be to drive for ferrari one day, but having a few years in F1 now, maybe he's changed his opinion.....

...ok my prediction for the weekend...Webber No.1

OK thats what i hope, but really, both McLarens in the top 3. Kimi to win

Webber No. 1 rosberg No. 2.

Hope Webber can get a podium this weekend, but if not i hope both renaults crash out sick of them.

ferrari 1 and 2, super aguri 3rd and 4th

More likely to be the order of retirements rather than winners of the race... :pwned:

In all seriousness, it should be an interesting race, but I can't see the winner being anything other than a Renault or McLaren. Hopefully one of those blue cars can prove me wrong and get up there on the podium as well.

ferrari always seem to do well at imola. this year should be no different. MS has been 'talking it up' over the past week, so ahould be a good show. however i have a feeling that it might be the same as last year. a close fight, but a renault on top....

1 M. Schumacher Ferrari 1:24.751 4

2 A. Wurz Williams 1:25.132 19

3 R. Kubica BMW 1:25.942 24

4 A. Davidson Honda 1:26.012 27

5 J. Trulli Toyota 1:26.417 7

6 R. Doornbos Red Bull 1:26.498 18

7 F. Massa Ferrari 1:26.596 4

8 D. Coulthard Red Bull 1:26.678 7

9 K. Räikkönen McLaren 1:26.938 5

10 C. Albers Midland F1 1:28.048 13

11 S. Speed Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:28.498 6

12 G. Mondini Midland F1 1:28.969 20

13 C. Klien Red Bull 1:29.106 6

14 N. Jani Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:29.695 13

15 T. Monteiro Midland F1 1:29.697 13

16 V. Liuzzi Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:30.348 6

17 T. Sato Super Aguri 1:31.217 17

18 Y. Ide Super Aguri 1:31.482 17

19 F. Alonso Renault no time 3

20 R. Schumacher Toyota no time 1

21 G. Fisichella Renault no time 2

22 JP. Montoya McLaren no time 1

23 N. Heidfeld BMW no time 1

24 J. Villeneuve BMW no time 1

25 R. Barrichello Honda no time 1

26 M. Webber Williams no time

27 N. Rosberg Williams no time

28 J. Button Honda no time

Times

01 M. Schumacher Ferrari 1:22.795

02 J. Button Honda 1:22.988

03 R. Barrichello Honda 1:23.242

04 F. Massa Ferrari 1:24.884

05 F. Alonso Renault 1:23.709

06 R. Schumacher Toyota 1:23.772

07 JP. Montoya McLaren 1:24.021

08 K. Räikkönen McLaren 1:24.158

09 J. Trulli Toyota 1:24.172

10 M. Webber Williams 1:24.795

11 G. Fisichella Renault 1:23.771

12 J. Villeneuve BMW 1:23.887

13 N. Rosberg Williams 1:23.966

14 D. Coulthard Red Bull 1:24.101

15 N. Heidfeld BMW 1:24.129

16 V. Liuzzi Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:24.520

17 C. Klien Red Bull 1:25.410

18 S. Speed Scuderia Toro Rosso 1:25.437

19 T. Monteiro Midland F1 1:26.820

20 C. Albers Midland F1 1:27.088

21 T. Sato Super Aguri 1:27.609

22 Y. Ide Super Aguri 1:29.282

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...