Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Webber could not win a chook raffle in a pub let alone an F1 race in that sht box..and now wait for it he is leaving Williams to go where???..some sources are saying RBR....oh for fk sake Webber piss off out of F1 and go to Chump..I mean Champ Car where all the other nobodys go.

Someone remind me to mention this quote when he wins a race next year with Renault :)

Webber's proven in the past that he can win races in all the other categories he's competed in given the right equipment, so to claim he is a 'chump' or a 'nobody' is ridiculous.

The simple truth is that he's never had a car capable of winning races in F1 - simple. There's no doubt that he's a top line driver. He's always outperformed his teammate and the relative performance of his car compared to the rest of the field. I'd go as far to say that arguably he's one of the better drivers in the championship - probably just behind Schumi, Alonso and Raikkonen (based on the fact that he has never had the equipment to truely compete with these guys head to head).

Admittedly, I'm probably a little biased, but i've never let that get in the way of a good argument :D

yeah, all the good drivers have the massive jaw.

DC

schuey (bigges of them all)

webbo

i reckon williams should give me and fatz a go next year. let rosberg sit at home popping his pimples. now that would be a good line-up. people would be shit scared to race us. can you say turn 1 incident. It would also bring a bit of class and reality to F1 racing.

According to Finnish tabloid Ilta-Sanomat, Ferrari has exercised its option on Kimi Raikkonen to race for the Italian team next season. This means the Finn would have signed a five-year-contract.

http://www.f1racing.net/en/news.php?newsID=126202

this webber quote gave me a smile. let's hope it's true.

"It would be a bit silly to walk away from Williams and not have anything, wouldn't it? I am very, very relaxed. I'll be here next year."

"People might think it's a bit of a risk for us to leave the team but Flavio has rarely been wrong in his decisions. I'm confident we can get something better, otherwise I would have stayed there wouldn't I?"

i am so excited right now. If webber does get a drive with renault it will be a major coup for him. and a chance that we will see some nice finishes for once, instead of just good quali perfomances.

Reading between the lines I think Williams was unable to enforce their option because there was doubtless a clause in the contract that required a certain amount of point to be scored by the German round or a certain position to be maintained in the championship. Frank wouldn't have let Mark go.

I bet Williams will be in the top 3 runners next year.

Hope Renault can find their form again after the loss of the mass-dampner. They went well in 2005 without it, hopefully the loss of this plus the switch to Bridgestones next year doesnt cause them to fall back to the mid-field (and leaving Webber in a similar position should he sign with them).

yeah alonso said that too. he claimed mass damper doesn't make that much difference. he said tyres were the big problem and they didn't have a handle on the rear end set-up.

i will be pissed off if williams do well next year. it just proves that mark got the short stick AGAIN!

Gascoyne is a good guy for a bottom dwelling team lookig to become a midfield team. He is a manager, not a techincal powerhouse. Williams need technical brilliance if they are goignt o turn it all around in a season. Gascoyne will charge a fortune and not bring anything they need ...well thats my take on it anyway

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry I haven't been following all the detail, so you may have tried this. Does it idle with the tiniest bit of throttle you can add? You've mentioned the IACV, does it have an AAC valve and have you adjusted it at all (ie, screw the idle adjust screw all the way in, then back it out a couple of turns until idle is stable)?
    • My bad, I unplugged the one underlined in red instead of yellow before. With the car started, after unplugging the IACV (the one underlined in yellow), it idled at around 400/500 for 3 seconds before stalling. Attempting to start the car without the IACV will not start the car.   It does stutter and sputter for around 5 seconds before dying. However, immediately after starting it, you can already hear some slight sputters from the exhaust.   It won't start with the AFM unplugged. If it is when the car has already started, it stalls in a few seconds.   Yesterday, I did take some logs using Nistune of 3 scenarios. Car idling till it stalls Car idling and unplugging the IACV Car idling and removing the AFM I also have some previous logs of when the Car is idling till it stalls and when driving and it cuts. I am not really knowledgeable enough to understand what to look for. After every test, car idles rougher and rougher, until I have to stop. It will be fine the day after.
    • There is no difference between a 17x8 and an 18x8. The total diameter of the tyre needs to remain +/- the same (so you don't mess up the gearing, speedo reading, and clearance when turning front wheels..... so you just need to use a lower profile tyre on th 18 than you do on the 17. /rocket surgery.
    • I thought the same to start with. But then I thought it was one of those LCAs where the end of the ARB goes through a bushing in the LCA itself, instead of having an end link.
    • Yeah - I mean, go the other way. Smaller range. Not larger.
×
×
  • Create New...