Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok yes Daniel thats what i have done, just bolted the top 4 up, motor is in, what a nitemare with the cv's etc :D, little bit of an issue with the bonnet clearance tends to hit, so i not sure either bonnet scoop or ill try adjusting it to suit. Tomorrow ill be getting my custom dump pipe installed then ill hook the gt3540 up :(. Funny thing is it looks just like an rb20 especially with the rb20 cover, i think some ppl are going to get a shock!!! Who else in SA has done this mod to 4wd???

Edited by FOOLBOOST

in sa i think you will be the first I dont think i have sold any to sa, and i havent heard of anyone having done it to 4wd. The issue with bonnet clearence isnt an issue with GTRS as much due to the rb26 head. The cv can be time consuming but if you did it again you could do it in half the time, its all about experience and practice. Sounds like you hookin in though good to see!!!

Ok yes Daniel thats what i have done, just bolted the top 4 up, motor is in, what a nitemare with the cv's etc :thumbsup:, little bit of an issue with the bonnet clearance tends to hit, so i not sure either bonnet scoop or ill try adjusting it to suit. Tomorrow ill be getting my custom dump pipe installed then ill hook the gt3540 up ;). Funny thing is it looks just like an rb20 especially with the rb20 cover, i think some ppl are going to get a shock!!! Who else in SA has done this mod to 4wd???

Sound like your getting closer to start-up. Im getting closer to starting my conversion.

RB30det Should be a good thing in a 4wd, after having my 300rwkw RB30 in a 2WD r32 for near 2 years, i cant wait to convert to 4WD and make use of some of the massive torque and power the RB30 has to offer.

I have heard of GTRS with 230+rwkw doing cranks in on hard launches due to oil all going towards rear of sump, what is the best way to combat this??? With my sump when i modified the oil pickup i put it right towards the back of the sump front buldge and as low as possible for maximium pickup, hope i dont do a crank in.

I have heard of GTRS with 230+rwkw doing cranks in on hard launches due to oil all going towards rear of sump, what is the best way to combat this???

its all rubbish from poorly informed people.

There is no such problem at all

have a read

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=110680

  • 3 weeks later...

Have any of the guys who have done this conversion come across a problem where the bottom bell housing bolts dont line up with the holes in the bottom of the sump due to the adapter plate? I saw this on another forum where the guy made his on plate

I am going to be putting my RB26/30 engine into my gtr soon and would like to know if this is an issue

Nathan

Have any of the guys who have done this conversion come across a problem where the bottom bell housing bolts dont line up with the holes in the bottom of the sump due to the adapter plate? I saw this on another forum where the guy made his on plate

I am going to be putting my RB26/30 engine into my gtr soon and would like to know if this is an issue

Nathan

Yes, what we did with mine was to attach the gearbox to the block and re-drill into the sump extension, either that or just bolt up the top bolts dont worry about the bottom ones :(

Yes, what we did with mine was to attach the gearbox to the block and re-drill into the sump extension, either that or just bolt up the top bolts dont worry about the bottom ones :P

So were exactly did you drill the holes into for the bottom gearbox mounts?

So were exactly did you drill the holes into for the bottom gearbox mounts?

All you have to do is bolt your gearbox on then drill through in the sump extension, the bottom 4 bolt holes this will make new bolt holes for the bottom 4 then stick a thread in them and your :). We used the vl gearbox which we figured out is different to the Gtr one after as the bolt holes didnt line up, doesnt matter if it comes to it just bolt the top ones up, dont worry about the bottom ones :) .

Edited by FOOLBOOST
  • 1 month later...

Guys, hope the conversions are going well, please let us know how you're getting on. What issues have you found that are created by the extra deck height? Dump pipe length springs to mind as a 'must do' but what else - 38mm is enough to interefere with a/c lines, ps pump lines, rad hoses, harnesses, earth straps etc. Would be great to know how you've overcome these.

Regards

Guys, hope the conversions are going well, please let us know how you're getting on. What issues have you found that are created by the extra deck height? Dump pipe length springs to mind as a 'must do' but what else - 38mm is enough to interefere with a/c lines, ps pump lines, rad hoses, harnesses, earth straps etc. Would be great to know how you've overcome these.

Regards

a/c lines = not a problem, the A/C compressor is in the same place

ps pump lines = not a problem, the power steering pump is in the same place

rad hoses = not a problem, the standard hoses fit just fine

harnesses = the engine harness actually goes downwards on a RB26, so they actually fit better on the RB30

earth straps = not a problem, they bolt to the block in the same places. The only different one is the exhaust manifold to LHS inner guard. But I always use a larger capacity cable anyway, so no big deal. Plus you have to change it if you change the exhaust manifolds.

:P cheers :mad:

Edited by Sydneykid
so with a 26/30 TT config engine using all of the standard bolt on parts I need to do nothing different to a normal RB26 engine r and r except lengthen the dumps and the above mentioned earth strap, and tune? i guess fmc plumbing too..but that's ALL?

No change to the intercooler plumbing either. But I used silicone joiners, maybe they were a little longer.

As previously mentioned, you will have to redrill the lower bell housing bolts, but that's a 5 minute job.

I didn't lengthen the dumps either, but they weren't standard ones.

I upgraded the sump (Performance Metalcraft) for GTR oil surge prevention.

Plus added an oil cooler, of course.

I also extended ther lower cam cover, so it met up with the standard RB26 top cover (keeps the rocks out)

:ermm: cheers :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...